VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Arumugam .S v. The Managing Director

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
28 July 2023
Bench
S Justice L.Victoria Gowriauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 18203/2023

Judgment

ORDER The present writ petition has been filed seeking direction to the respondents to disburse the petitioner's difference amount of salary from

01.01.2016 to 30.10.2016, on the basis of VIIth Pay Commission along with interest 6%.

¶2By consent of both parties, this Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal at the stage of admission itself.

¶3The petitioner was appointed in the respondent Corporation as a Junior Engineer on 17.08.1982. He retired from service as a Deputy Manager on

30.10.2016 on attaining the age of superannuation, after completing 34 years of service. When he was in service, VII Pay Commission came into effect on

01.01.2016. However, the same was implemented on 01.04.2018 after the retirement of the petitioner. The petitioner's pension and commutation were disbursed on the basis of VII Pay Commission and the same is still continuing. However, the salary has to be revised on the basis of VII Pay Commission. If that is done, the petitioner will get difference amount than which he is receiving as on date. The respondents have already revised the pension and recovered the amount from pension for commutation with retrospective effect from the date of retirement and the recovery was effected on 05.10.2019 and the revised commutation was issued on 30.01.2021.

¶4The petitioner made several representations to the respondents in person. However, that is of no avail. Finally, the petitioner has sent another representation on 03.07.2023, which was also of no avail. Hence, this writ petition came to filed.

¶5Considering the facts and circumstances of this case, this Court is inclined to direct the respondents to disburse the petitioner's difference in amount of salary from 01.01.2016 to 30.10.2016, on the basis of VII Pay Commission along with 6% interest.

¶6This writ petition stands disposed of, accordingly. There shall be no order as to costs.

28.07.2023 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes BTR To

1.The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Kumbakonam) Limited, New Railway Station Road, Kumbakonam-612 001.

2.The General Manager, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Kumbakonam) Limited, Karaikudi Region, Mardhupathi, Managiri Post, Karaikudi, Sivagangai District.

L.VICTORIA GOWRI, J.

BTR

28.07.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 28.07.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI S.Arumugam ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Kumbakonam) Limited, New Railway Station Road, Kumbakonam-612 001. 2.The General Manager, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Kumbakonam) Limited, Karaikudi Region, Mardhupathi, Managiri Post, Karaikudi, Sivagangai District. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to disburse the petitioners difference amount of salary from 01.01.2016 to 30.10.2016, on the basis of VIIth Pay Commission along with interest 6%. For Petitioner : Mr.K.Gokul For Respondents : Mr.K.Ramaiah Standing Counsel

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.