M/S.V.R.Construction v. The Authorized Officer

ORDER [Order of the Court was made by The Hon'ble CHIEF JUSTICE] We have heard Mr.S.Ramsundarvijayaraj, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.C.Deepak, learned Standing Counsel for the bank.

¶2In fact, the petitioner has a remedy before the Debts Recovery Tribunal to challenge the auction sale.

¶3This Court on 27.07.2023 had granted stay of the sale proceedings on the ground that the petitioner's lands are agricultural lands and are exempted under Section 31 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002.

¶4The learned counsel for the respondent bank submits that in fact, the said lands are not agricultural lands and is used for construction activities.

¶5The same would be a disputed question of fact. The petitioner has a remedy before the Debts Recovery Tribunal challenging the auction sale.

¶6The learned counsel for the bank submits that as stay was granted, the sale could not take place further and if the bank wants to take up sale, then fresh notice has to be issued.

¶7In view of that, nothing survives in the writ petition. In case the bank issues fresh auction sale notice, the petitioner is at liberty to challenge the same before the Debts Recovery Tribunal as permissible under law.

¶8The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. No Costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. (S.V.G., CJ.) (C.K., J.)

30.08.2023 NCC :Yes/No Index : Yes/No PM W.P(MD)No.18160oofo2023 THEoHON'BLEoCHIEFoJUSTICE ando C.KUMARAPPAN,oJ. PM W.P.(MD)No.18160oofo2023

30.08.2023 Pageg4gofg4

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 30.08.2023 CORAM : THE HON'BLE MR.SANJAY V.GANGAPURWALA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND The HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN and W.M.P(MD)Nos.15142 & 15143 of 2023 M/s.V.R.Construction, Rep. by its Managing Director, R.Rajangam ... Petitioner Vs. The Authorized Officer, Canara Bank, Tallakulam, Madurai. .. Respondents PRAYER: Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records pertaining to the impugned sale notice of the respondent in Ref:MDU/TAL/SN/VR/AUG/2023-24 dated 05.07.2023 and quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Ramsundarvijayaraj For Respondent : Mr.C.Deepak, Standing Counsel