VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Abdulkadher Bathiyudeen v. The Sub Inspector of Police

DISMISSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
3 August 2023
Bench
G.Ilangovanauthor
Case no.
CRL OP(MD) 13766/2023

Judgment

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 03/08/2023 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.ILANGOVAN Abdulkadher Bathiyudeen ... Petitioner/Accused No.2

Vs The State rep.by, The Sub Inspector of Police, Cumbum North Police Station Theni District. In Crime No.239/2023.. ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : M/s.Manoharan.R,

Advocate. For Respondent : Mr.S.Manikandan,

Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.239/2023 on the file of the respondent police. ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner/A2, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 269, 270, 273, 328, 353 of IPC and Section 6(b) and 24(1) of Cigarettes and Other Tabacco Products (Prohibition of Advertisements and Regulation of Trade and Commerce, Production, Supply and Distribution)Act, 2023, in Crime No.239 of 2023 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

¶2The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner along with the other accused persons have found in illegal possession of banned Tobacco Products. Hence, the complaint.

¶3The learned Counsel for the Petitioner would submit that the Petitioner is an innocent and he has has been falsely implicated in this case.

¶4The learned Government Advocate(Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police submitted that the petitioner is the driver of the first accused and in two cases, the petitioner was arrested along the first accused and he has admitted his guilt and also paid fine amount. He further submitted that the petitioner was continuously involved this type of offence along with the first accused.

¶5A perusal of CD file shows that the petitioner along with first accused have continuously involved this type of illegal transportation.

¶6Considering the submission made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) and also conduct and bad antecedents of the petitioner, this Court feels that the petitioner is not entitle for the discretionary relief of anticipatory bail. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed.

sd/-

03/08/2023

/ TRUE COPY /

/09/2023

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S. )

Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,

Madurai - 625 023. tta TO

¶1The Sub Inspector of Police, Cumbum North Police Station Theni District.

¶2The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. +1 CC to M/s.R.MANOHARAN, Advocate ( SR-11832[I] dated 04/08/2023 ) ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.13766 of 2023 Date :03/08/2023

RK/DD (11/09/2023) 4P /4C Madurai Bench of Madras High Court is issuing certified copies in this format from 17/07/2023

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.