VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Vishnu v. The Inspector of Police

DISMISSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
27 July 2023
Bench
G.Ilangovanauthor
Case no.
CRL OP(MD) 13768/2023

Judgment

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 27/07/2023 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.ILANGOVAN CRL OP(MD). No.13768 of 2023 Vishnu ... Petitioner / Accused No.2

Vs State represented by The Inspector of Police, Puliyarai Police Station, Tenkasi District. Crime No. 70 of 2017. ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : M/s.S.Sivakumar, Advocate For Respondent : Mr.S.Ravi

Additional Public Posecutor

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No. 70 of 2017 on the file of the Respondent Police. ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner/Accused No.2, apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 3, 4(a) of the Explosive Substances Act, 1908 and 8(c), 20(b)(ii)(A) of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 altered to Sections 8(c),20(b)(ii)(A) of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substance Act and Section 5 of IES Act, in Crime No.70 of 2017, on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

¶2The case of the prosecution is that the defacto complainant is the Special Sub Inspector, received some information and after making entry in the GD book, along with police team, she was doing vehicle check up on the Sengottai to Punalur Road, at that time, he found a car bearing registration No.KL 01 CA 3906, a four wheeler was coming and that was intercepted. Three persons were available. Among the three, two persons were escaped from the place. Another person was apprehended. Enquiry was made and he revealed his name and has also the other persons who absconded. He also handed over one country bomb and 150 grams of Ganja. He revealed that he purchased the Ganja from an unknown person in Kerala and transporting the same to Tamil Nadu for selling. Hence the present complaint came to be registered.

¶3The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent, he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and he has been falsely implicated in this case.

¶4The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) would submit that final report has been filed before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Shencottah and the same was taken cognizance in P.R.C.No.17 of 2020 and the committal process is underway. The petitioner has shown as absconding accused and warrant was also issued against the petitioner. Other accused persons are appearing before the committal court.

¶5The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that since the petitioner is residing at Kerala State, he is unaware of the issuance of warrant.

¶6Since warrant was issued against the petitioner, let him surrender before the committal Court and seek regular bail.

¶7This Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed.

sd/-

27/08/2023

/ TRUE COPY /

/08/2023

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.)

Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,

Madurai - 625 023. PNN TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, SHENCOTTAH. 2 DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TIRUNELVELI. 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE PULIYARAI POLICE STATION, TENKASI DISTRICT. 4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,

MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT,

MADURAI. ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.13768 of 2023 Date :27/07/2023 SS/VRS/17/08/2023/4P/5C Madurai Bench of Madras High Court is issuing certified copies in this format from 17/07/2023

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.