K.Subramani v. The District Collector,

ORDER The present Writ Petition has been filed seeking a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to quash the impugned order dated 22.08.2025 and consequently direct the respondents to issue a fresh patta in favour of the petitioner.

2.Mr.I.Pinaygash, learned counsel appearing for the State, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.

3.The petitioner claims right over the property in old Survey Field No. 16/5, to an extent of 5 acres ½ cents, based on the sale deed dated 08.03.2001. The petitioner has submitted an application for the issuance of patta. The respondent, after considering the same, rejected the application, which is impugned herein.

4.The contention of the petitioner is that, although the petitioner has purchased the property to an extent of 11½ cents, he is in possession of 16 cents in that area, including 5 cents which is classified as "Boosthi." The petitioner is now seeking issuance of patta for 16 cents.

5.This Court is of the considered opinion that the petitioner is in occupation of 5 cents over which he has no entitlement. However, the impugned order, which completely rejects the issuance of patta, is incorrect. Therefore, the impugned order is quashed to the extent of denying patta for 11½ cents and is sustained in respect of the remaining portion. The respondents are directed to issue patta in favour of the petitioner to an extent of 11½ cents based on the sale deed. As far as the remaining 5 cents is concerned, the respondents may consider issuing a B memo to the petitioner and pass appropriate orders, after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and any rival claimants, if any. The entire exercise shall be completed within a period of twelve (12) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

6.With the above directions, this Writ Petition stands disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

25.06.2026

NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes ps To

1.The District Collector, Karur District,

2.The District Revenue Officer, Collectorate Complex, Karur District,

3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Office of the Revenue Divisional Officer, Collectorate Buildings, Thanthonimalai,

4.The Tahsildar, Manmangalam Taluk, Karur District.

S.SRIMATHY, J. ps

25.06.2026

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 25.06.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY and W.M.P(MD)No.13169 of 2026 K.Subramani ... Petitioner Vs 1.The District Collector, Karur District, 2.The District Revenue Officer, Collectorate Complex, Karur District, 3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Office of the Revenue Divisional Officer, Collectorate Buildings, Thanthonimalai, 4.The Tahsildar, Manmangalam Taluk, Karur District. ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, challenging the impugned order passed by the second respondent, in his proceedings in Pa.Mu.C1/14167/2025 dated 22.08.2025 and quash the same as illegal and consequently direct the respondents to issue fresh patta in favour of the petitioner holding the possession of land comprised in old S.F.No.16/5, to an extent of Acre 0.05-1/2 cents, situated at Manmangalam village, Karur Taluk, Karur District, on the basis of the petitioner's representation dated 21.10.2024. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Rama Guru For Respondents : Mr.I.Pinaygash counsel for State