M.C.Subramanian v. Cheliyan

O R D E R Contending that the direction for survey given by this Court has not been complied with, the present contempt petition came to be filed.

¶2When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned Additional Government Pleader submitted that on

28.08.2023 survey was conducted in respect of survey No.4/2B and 3B and that four boundaries have also been shown to the petitioner. However, survey could not be conducted in respect of survey No.4/3A2 as it does not belong to the petitioner.

¶3The first respondent is directed to serve survey report along with sketch and also inform the petitioner that survey could not be conducted in respect of survey No.4/3A2. With this direction to the first respondent, this contempt petition is closed.

29.08.2023 NCS : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No PMU 3 CONT.P.(MD)NO.1611 OF 2023 To:

¶1The Tahsildar, Dindigul West Taluk, Dindigul District.

¶2The Head Surveyor, Dindigul, Dindigul District. 4 CONT.P.(MD)NO.1611 OF 2023 G.R.SWAMINATHAN,J. PMU CONT.P.(MD)No.1611 of 2023 IN W.P.(MD)No.4500 of 2023

29.08.2023

1 CONT.P.(MD)NO.1611 OF 2023 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 29.08.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN CONT.P.(MD)No.1611 of 2023 IN W.P.(MD)No.4500 of 2023 M.C.Subramanian ... Petitioner / Petitioner Vs. 1. Mr.Cheliyan, Tahsildar, Dindigul West Taluk, Dindigul District. 2. Mr.Murugesan, Head Surveyor, Dindigul, Dindigul District. ... Contemnors / Respondents Prayer: Contempt petition filed under under Section 11 of the Contempt of Court Act 1971, to call the contemnors/ respondents for having willfully and wantonly disobeying the order passed by this Court in W.P.(MD)No.4500 of 2023 dated 02.03.2023 and punish them in accordance with law. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Senthil Kumar For Respondents: Mr.S.Shanmugavel, Additional Government Pleader. * * * 2 CONT.P.(MD)NO.1611 OF 2023