G.Periasamy v. The District Collector

ORDER The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has circulated a letter dated 03.10.2023 to the Registrar (Judicial) for withdrawing this writ petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.

¶2Based on the letter dated 03.10.2023, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

09.10.2023 ogy NCC : Yes / No. Index : Yes / No. Internet : Yes / No. To

¶1The District Collector, Virudhunagar District, Virudhunagar.

¶2The Deputy Director (Panchayats), Rural Development Department, Virudhunagar District, Virudhunagar.

¶3The Block Development Officer, (Village Panchayat)

B.PUGALENDHI, J. ogy

¶4The Panchayat Secretary, Krishnapuram Panchayat,

09.10.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 09.10.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI and W.M.P.(MD)No.8843 of 2018 G.Periasamy ... Petitioner versus 1. The District Collector, Virudhunagar District, Virudhunagar. 2. The Deputy Director (Panchayats), Rural Development Department, Virudhunagar District, Virudhunagar. 3. The Block Development Officer, (Village Panchayat) 4. The Panchayat Secretary, Krishnapuram Panchayat, 5. S.Lakshmi ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, to direct the 2nd and 3rd respondents to restore the petitioner's name in the House Tax Assessment No.3098 for the house bearing Door No.7/92, Ambedkar Nagar, Krishnapuram Panchayat, Rajapalayam Panchyat Union, Virudhunagar District and thereby direct them to pay a compensation of Rs.1,50,000/- for their lethargic and negligent act and for the damage they have caused to the petitioner by issuing house tax receipt in the name of the 5th respondent for his house within the time limit that may be stipulated by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.B.Satheeshkumar For R1 to R4 : Mr.P.T.Thiraviam, Government Advocate For R5 : No No appearance