VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Sivakumar v. The Income Tax Officer

ALLOWED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
21 August 2023
Bench
S Justice S.Srimathyauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 18542/2023

Judgment

O R D E R This writ petition is filed for writ of Mandamus, to direct the 3rd respondent to lift the attachment order, dated 18.09.2019, passed by the first respondent / Income Tax Officer under Section 281 B of the Income Tax Act, 1961, pursuant to approval of the second respondent, dated

06.09.2019, within a stipulated time that may be fixed by this Court.

¶2The petitioner is an assessee under the Income Tax Department. The respondents have assessed the income tax of the petitioner for the assessment year 2015-2016, 2016-2017, under various provisions of the Act. The petitioner could not pay the tax. Hence, the respondents have attached the property. The contention of the petitioner is that if the respondents allow to sell the property, he would pay the tax from the sale proceeds and has stated in the affidavit that he would submit an undertaking to this effect.

¶3On instructions, the learned Senior Standing Counsel appearing for respondents 1 and 2 submitted that if the assessee is submitting an affidavit or indemnity bond or any kind of assurance to the Court that he would pay the tax dues immediately after selling the property, then the respondents would obey the same.

¶4Therefore, this Court is directing the petitioner to submit an affidavit / indemnity bond to the respondents within a period of one week from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The respondents shall lift the attachment within a period of one week thereafter and communicate the same to the 3rd respondent. The 3rd respondent shall reverse the entry of attachment. Then, the petitioner is directed to sell the property and shall adhere to the undertaking affidavit / indemnity bond.

5.With the above said observation, the writ petition is allowed. No costs. Index : Yes / No

21.08.2023 Internet : Yes NCC : Yes / No Tmg To The Sub Registrar, Office of the Sub Registrar, Veeracholan, Virudhunagar District. S.SRIMATHY, J Tmg

21.08.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 21.08.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY Sivakumar ... Petitioner vs. 1.The Income Tax Officer, Ward 2, Ramanathapuram, No.176, Sapthagiri Complex, Vandikara Street, Ramanathapuram-623 501. 2.The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Madurai, Madurai-625 002. 3.The Sub Registrar, Office of the Sub Registrar, Veeracholan, Virudhunagar District. ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, to direct the 3rd respondent to lift the attachment order, dated 18.09.2019, passed by the first respondent / Income Tax Officer under Section 281 B of the Income Tax Act, 1961, pursuant to approval of the second respondent, dated 06.09.2019, within a stipulated time that may be fixed by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.Henri Tiphagne For R1 and 2 : Mr.N.Dilip Kumar For R3 : Mr.R.Suresh Kumar Additional Government Pleader *****

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.