- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 28 July 2023
- Bench
- G.Ilangovan
- Case no.
- CRL OP(MD) 13825/2023
Judgment
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 28/07/2023 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.ILANGOVAN Velusamy ... Petitioner/Accused 3 Vs The State rep.by The Sub Inspector of Police, Vaiyampatty Police Station, Trichy District. Crime No.284 of 2023. ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : M/s.KARUNANITHI M, Advocate
For Respondent : Mr.S.MANIKANDAN,
Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.284 of 2023 on the file of the Respondent Police. ORDER : The Court made the following order :-
The petitioner/Accused, apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Section 379 IPC r/w 21(1) of Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957, in Crime No.284 of 2023, on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.
¶2The case of the prosecution is that on 11.06.2023 the accused persons had transported one unit red sand in the vehicle. Therefore, the present case came to be registered.
¶3The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent and not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. The co-accused has already been enlarged on anticipatory bail. Hence, prays to release him on anticipatory bail.
¶4The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) for the respondent police submitted that though the petitioner is not having any previous case, the accused persons had transported mineral without valid permit. Hence, prays to dismiss the petition.
5.Heard the learned counsel appearing on either side and perused the materials placed before this Court.
6.Considering the facts that the petitioner is not having any previous case and the co-accused has already been enlarged on bail, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
¶7Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is allowed and the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Manapparai, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m. until further orders. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.
¶8The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.
sd/-
28/07/2023
/ TRUE COPY /
/08/2023
Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.)
Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,
Madurai - 625 023. PNM TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MANAPPARAI. 2 DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TIRUCHIRAPPALLI DISTRICT. 3 THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VAIYAMPATTY POLICE STATION, TRICHY DISTRICT. 4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.13825 of 2023 Date :28/07/2023 SA/VRS/SAR. /04.08.2023/4P/5C Madurai Bench of Madras High Court is issuing certified copies in this format from 17/07/2023.
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.