Prasanna v. Kunjaram

JUDGMENT When the matter is taken up for hearing today, the learned counsel appearing for the appellants is present. But there was no representation for the appellants for the past two hearings. Moreover, though the death of the first respondent was reported on 17.03.2022, steps are not taken till now. Hence, this Appeal Suit is dismissed as abated. No costs.

15.09.2023 NCC :yes/No Index :yes/No Internet:yes/No csm A.S.(MD)No.55 of 2016

A.S.(MD)No.55 of 2016 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 15.09.2023 CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.MURALI SHANKAR A.S.(MD)No.55 of 2016 1. Prasanna 2. Piriyanga 3. Minor K.Kaleeswaran ... Appellants/ Plaintiffs Vs. 1. Kunjaram 2. Rajarethinam ... Respondents/ Defendants Prayer : This Appeal Suit filed under Section 96 of Civil Procedure Code, to set aside the judgment and decree dated 18.12.2015 passed in O.S.No.38 of 2010 on the file of Additional District Judge, Ramanathapuram and allow the present appeal. For Appellants : M/s.C.K.Latha for Mr.K.K.Kannan For R2 : No appearance A.S.(MD)No.55 of 2016 K.MURALI SHANKAR ,J. csm