VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Syed Kareem.S v. The Authorized Officer

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
1 November 2023
Bench
S.M. Subramaniamauthor, V. Lakshminarayanan
Case no.
WP(MD) 18350/2023

Judgment

ORDER (Order of the Court was made by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM,J.) The respective learned counsels appearing on behalf of the parties to the lis submitted that the dues as per the interim order of this Court have already been settled, which is acknowledged by the learned counsel for the writ petitioner. Since the dues are settled, no further orders are required and consequently, the Writ Petition stands closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition stands closed.

(S.M.S.,J.) (V.L.N.,J.)

01.11.2023 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No Lm To The Joint Sub Registrar No. 2, O/o. the No.2 Joint Sub Registrar, Tenkasi. S.M.SUBRAMANIAM,J. and V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN,J. Lm

01.11.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 01.11.2023 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN and W.M.P.(MD).No.15243 of 2023 S.Syed Kareem .. Petitioner Vs. 1.The Authorized Officer, Repco Home Finance Limited, 1st Floor, Hotel Sakunthala International, Tiruvandrum Road, Vannarapettai, Tirunelveli - 627 003. 2.The Branch Manager, "Repco Home Finance" Limited, No. 117, 1st Floor, PSS Complex, Railway Feeder Road, Tenkasi - 627 811. 3.The Joint Sub Registrar No. 2, O/o. The No.2 Joint Sub Registrar, Tenkasi. 4.Ukkiramapandian .. Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 and 2 to register the sale deed, in favour of this petitioner as per the confirmed e-auction and receipt of auction money from the petitioner in consequence of the auction held on 24.01.2023, of the property land and building situated at Kuthukalvalasai Village, S.No.184/2, K.R.Colony, D.No.5-263(4), within an extent of 3.17 cents (1380 Sq.Feet - 128.21 Sq.Meters) in consequence of the SARFAESI Acts and Rules, for the loan account of 4th respondent and pass such further to pay Rs.7,00,000/- to the petitioner towards compensation as described above. For Petitioner : Mr.F.X.Eugene For R-1 : Mr.Omprakash Senior Counsel for Mr.R.Sivakumar For R-3 : Mr.S.Kameswaran Government Advocate For R-4 : Mr.M.V.Athiseshan

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.