Nadar Susila Lakshmi, v. Joice Pappa, W/O. Sekar,

JUDGMENT When the matter was taken up for hearing on 29.08.2017, the learned counsel for the appellant filed a memo reporting 'no instructions'. After recording the memo, this Court directed the Registry to issue notice to the appellant. The notice sent to the appellant by the Registry was returned with an endorsement 'unclaimed''. There is no representation for the appellant. Hence, the Second Appeal is dismissed for default. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

03.03.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No vsd To

1.The Sub Court, Ambasamudram.

2.The District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Cheranmahadevi.

3.The Record Keeper, Vernacular Records, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

S.SOUNTHAR, J. vsd and M.P(MD)No.1 of 2014

03.03.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 03.03.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR and M.P(MD)No.1 of 2014 Nadar Susila Lakshmi ... Appellant/Appellant /Plaintiff Vs. Joice Pappa ... Respondent/Respondent / Defendant PRAYER :- This Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code, against the judgment and decree passed in A.S.No.33 of 2012 on the file of the Sub Court, Ambasamudram, dated 11.01.2013, confirming the judgment and decree in O.S.No.118 of 2004 on the file of the District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Cheranmahadevi, dated 26.03.2012. For Appellant : No Appearance For Respondent : Mr.P.Subbaraj