- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 27 September 2023
- Bench
- C.Kumarappan
- Case no.
- CRP(MD) 826/2018
Judgment
O R D E R When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner represented that the prayer sought for in this Civil Revision Petition has become infructuous and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.
¶2In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructous. There shall be no order as to costs.
27.09.2023 NCC : Yes/No
Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No ebsi To
¶1The I Additional District Court, Madurai. C.KUMARAPPAN,J. ebsi C.R.P(NPD)(MD)No.826 of 2018
27.09.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 27.09.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN C.R.P.(NPD)(MD)No.826 of 2018 Anburaj ... Petitioner/Petitioner/Respondent -vs- Vellaimalai ... Respondent/Respondent/ Petitioner PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Section 115 of C.P.C, to set aside the order of the I Additional District Court, Madurai in I.A.No.266 of 2017 in G.W.O.P.No.40 of 2013 and consequently direct the trial Court to condone the delay of 750 days in filing the ex parte set aside petition. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Solaisamy
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.