VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Ganesan v. The District Collector

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
31 July 2023
Bench
B.Pugalendhiauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 18498/2023

Judgment

ORDER The petitioner has submitted an application dated 05.06.2023, before the respondents 2 and 3, requesting them to survey his land. Since the said application has not been considered by the respondents, the petitioner is before this Court.

¶2Mr.M.Sarangan, learned Additional Government Pleader, who takes notice for respondents 1 to 3, on instructions, submits that based on the petitioner's application, when the survey officials attempted to survey the land, at that time, the 5th respondent has raised certain objections and therefore, survey could not be conducted.

¶3If there is any objection, the survey officials shall cause notice to the objectors, as per Section 10 of the Tamil Nadu Survey and Boundaries Act, 1923 and thereafter, to take decision on survey based on their objections.

¶4The survey officials, by referring to the objection made by the 5th respondent, cannot keep the petitioner's application pending without any progress. Therefore, the 3rd respondent is directed to issue a notice to the 5th respondent and other objectors, if any and thereafter, take a decision in accordance with law, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶6With the above direction, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs.

31.07.2023 ogy NCC : Yes / No. Index : Yes / No. Internet : Yes / No.

B.PUGALENDHI, J. ogy To

¶1The District Collector, Theni District.

¶2The Tahsildhar, Periyakulam, Theni District.

¶3The Taluk Surveyor, Periyakulam, Theni District.

¶4The Inspector of Police, Jeyamangalam Police Station, Theni District.

31.07.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 31.07.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI Ganesan ... Petitioner versus 1. The District Collector, Theni District. 2. The Tahsildhar, Periyakulam, Theni District. 3. The Taluk Surveyor, Periyakulam, Theni District. 4. The Inspector of Police, Jeyamangalam Police Station, Theni District. 5. Munniyandi Thevar ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondent Nos.2 and 3 to conduct survey and demarcate the boundaries of the petitioner's land situated in Survey No.1866/1B in Gullapuram Village, Periyakulam, Theni District and to provide adequate police protection for fencing his lands within the time stipulated by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.A.Karthick Kumar For R1 to R3 : Mr.M.Sarangan, Additional Government Pleader For R4 : Mr.P.Kottaichamy, Government Advocate

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.