Shanthikkumar.J v. The Superintendent of Police

ORDER This Writ Petition has been filed to call for the records relating to the impugned orders of the 2nd respondent dated 14.05.2022 and 08.08.2022 in connection with Crime No.22 of 2018 on the file of 2nd respondent Police quash the same and consequently direct the 1st respondent to appoint an investigation officer not below the rank of Deputy Superintendent of Police and monitoring by the 1st respondent.

¶2Today, when the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that now the order has been passed by the first respondent directing the 2nd respondent to make further investigation in this matter and hence, the matter has become infructuous.

¶3Recording the said submission, this Writ Petition is disposed of as infructuous. However, the petitioner is directed to appear before the 2nd respondent. The second respondent also record the further statement of the petitioner. In the light of the statement to be given by the petitioner, the 2nd respondent is directed to conduct and complete the investigation within a period of three months.

28.06.2023 Index : Yes/No Internet:Yes/No trp To

1.The Superintendent of Police, Thoothukudi District, Thoothukudi.

2.The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Thoothukudi.

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. G.ILANGOVAN, J., trp

28.06.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 28.06.2023 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN J.Shantikkumar ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Superintendent of Police, Thoothukudi District, Thoothukudi. 2.The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Thoothukudi. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue writ, order or direction or any other writ in the nature of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records relating to the impugned orders of the 2nd respondent dated 14.05.2022 and 08.08.2022 in connection with Crime No.22 of 2018 on the file of 2nd respondent Police quash the same and consequently direct the 1st respondent to appoint an investigation officer not below the rank of Deputy Superintendent of Police by monitoring the 1st respondent. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Sekar For Respondents : Mr.B.Nambiselvan Additional Public Prosecutor