Bharathidasan University v. The National Council for Technical Education

O R D E R When the matter was taken up for hearing today, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the prayer sought for in the writ petition has become infructuous.

2.Recording the same, this writ petition stands closed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

15.11.2023 NCC : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No Index : Yes/No PNM

N.ANAND VENKATESH, J. PNM ORDER IN and WMP(MD)Nos.16317 and 16318 of 2021

15.11.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 15.11.2023 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH and WMP(MD)Nos.16317 and 16318 of 2021 Bharathidasan University, rep. through its Registrar ... Petitioner Vs 1. The National Council for Technical Education, Through its Regional Director, Southern Regional Committee, G-7, Sector-10 (Near Sector 10 Metro Station), Dwaraka, New Delhi 110. 2. The University Grants Commission, Through its Chairaman, UGC Distance Education Bureau, Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi 110 002. ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent to drop all further action pursuant to the show cause notice issued by the first respondent in F.No.SRO/NCTE/APSO4054/B.Ed (DE/TN/2020/19102, dated 01.10.2020 and in F.No.SRC/APSO4054/ TN/B.Ed(ODL) /2020-21/123040, dated 19.01.2021 by recording full compliance by the petitioner. For Petitioner : Mr.VR. Shanmuganathan For Respondents : Mr.Su.Srinivasan (R1) Standing Counsel Mr.B.Vijay Karthikeyan (R2) Standing Counsel