VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Aravindhan v. The Inspector of Police

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
7 July 2023
Bench
P.Dhanabalauthor
Case no.
CRL OP(MD) 16622/2021

Judgment

ORDER This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to quash the First Information Report in Crime No.5 of 2021 pending on the file of the first respondent.

¶2According to the petitioner, the defacto complainant one Iswariya has lodged a complaint before the first respondent police as against the petitioners on 20.02.2021. The first petitioner is the husband of the defacto complainant Iswariya, who is the second respondent herein. On 26.02.2021 the petitioners have handed over all the jewels and articles to the second respondent and also she made an endorsement to that effect. After marriage the second respondent refused to live peacefully with the first petitioner and thereafter she consumed poison on 16.01.2021. The second respondent also lodged another complaint on 01.03.2021 before the first respondent. The first petitioner has also filed a petition a H.M.O.P. petition before the Sub Court, Uthamapalayam. While so, the second respondent has given a false complaint against the petitioners in Crime No.5 of 2021 for the offences under Sections 498(A) and 294(b) of IPC. Only to harass the petitioners the present First Information Report has been registered and same is liable to be quashed.

¶3When the case is taken up for hearing today, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor represented that already the case has been charge sheeted before the learned Judicial Magistrate,Bodinayakkanur in C.C.No.70 of 2021 and the case stands posted for further proceedings on 18.07.2023.

¶4The learned counsel appearing for the second respondent/defacto complainant also admitted that the case has been charge sheeted and C.C.No. 70 of 2021 is pending before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Bodinayakkanur and therefore nothing survives in this petition.

¶5Considering the representation made by the learned counsel appearing on either side and also the considering the fact the investigation has been completed and the final report has been taken on file by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Bodinayakkanur in C.C.No.70 of 2021, it is not appropriate to invoke the provisions under section 482 of Cr.P.C at this stage and the matter to be tried elaborately, therefore this petition is liable to be dismissed.

¶6At this juncture the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners prayed that this Court may direct the trial Court to expeditious the matter and to dispose of the case within the stipulated time.

¶7Since the matter is pending from the year 2021 and also considering the nature of offence, it is appropriate to direct the learned Judicial Magistrate, Bodinayakkanur to dispose of the case pending in C.C.No.70 of 2021 on its file as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of four months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶8With the above said observation and direction, the Criminal Original Petition is disposed of. Consequently connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

07.07.2023 NCC : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No Index : Yes/No aav To

¶1The Judicial Magistrate, Bodinayakkanur

¶2The Inspector of Police All Women Police Station, Bodi, Theni District

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. P. DHANABAL,J. aav

07.07.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 07.07.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. DHANABAL and Crl.M.P(MD) No.8975 of 2021 1. Aravindhan 2. Shanmuganathan 3. Murugaveni 4. Venkatesh 5. Rathi 6. Chitra 7. P.Ravikumar 8. Thenmozhi ...Petitioners Vs 1. The Inspector of Police All Women Police Station, Bodi, Theni District 2. Iswariya ...Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, praying this Court to call for the records relating to the First Information Report in Crime No.5 of 2021 pending on the file of the first respondent and quash the same as against the petitioners. For Petitioner : Mr.V.Sukumar For R-1 : Mr.R.M.Anbunithi Additional Public Prosecutor For R-2 : Mr.B.Arun

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.