R.Sundaragopal (Died) v. R. Raghavan,

JUDGMENT It is stated by the learned counsel appearing for the appellant that the sole appellant died and despite notice was sent to the legal heirs of the deceased sole appellant, they have not turned up. According to him, steps could not be taken.

2.In view of the above, this Appeal Suit is dismissed as abated. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

25.04.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No ta To

1.The IV Additional District Court,Madurai.

2.The Section Officer, Vernacular Records, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. N.SATHISH KUMAR

, J.

ta

25.04.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 25.04.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR and M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2015 R.Sundaragopal (died) ...Appellants/2nd Defendant Vs. 1.R.Raghavan 2.R.Kamala 3.S.Nikhilkumar ... Respondents/Defendants PRAYER: This Appeal Suit is filed under Section 96 of Civil Procedure Code, to allow this appeal by setting aside the judgment and decree dated 11.03.2015 made in O.S.No.185 of 2007 on the file of the IV Additional District Court, Madurai. For Appellants : Mr.I.Velpradeep For R1 : Mr.A.N.Ramanthan For R2 : Mr.R.Suriya Narayanan For R3 : Mr.I.Saliyakhan