VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

The Secretary v. Sri Manthiramoorthi Higher

DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
10 July 2023
Bench
Anita Sumanth, R.Vijayakumar
Case no.
WA(MD) 1389/2014

Judgment

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 10.07.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR W.A.(MD)Nos.1389 to 1391 of 2014 and M.P.(MD)Nos.1, 1 and 1 of 2014 W.A.(MD)No.1389 of 2014:-

1.The Secretary,

2.T.S.Arulkumar ... Appellants PRAYER:-Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent to set aside the order, dated 22.09.2014 passed by this Court in W.P(MD)No. 11198 of 2014. W.A(MD)No.1390 of 2014:-

1.The Secretary,

2.T.S.Arulkumar ... Appellants PRAYER:- Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent to set aside the order, dated 22.09.2014 passed by this Court in W.P(MD)No. 11199 of 2014. W.A(MD)No.1391 of 2014:- The Secretary, ... Appellant PRAYER:- Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent to set aside the order, dated 22.09.2014 passed by this Court in W.P(MD)No. 8498 of 2014. For Appellants :Mr.K.Vinoharan for Mr.I.Robert Chandrakumar For R1 :Mr.Deepak Arun for Mr.H.Arumugam For R2 :Mr.V.Om Prakash Government Advocate (in all cases) **** COMMON JUDGMENT (Judgment of the Court was delivered by DR.ANITA SUMANTH, J.) Mr.K.Vinoharan, learned Counsel representing the appellant, duly supported by an endorsement made by Mr.I.Robert Chandrakumar, learned Counsel for the appellants on record, states that these Writ Appeals rendered infructuous. Recording the same, these Writ Appeals stand dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. [A.S.M.J.,] & [R.V.J.,]

10.07.2023 NCC :Yes/No Index :Yes/No Internet :Yes cmr To The District Educational Officer,

DR.ANITA SUMANTH, J. AND

R.VIJAYAKUMAR, J. cmr W.A.(MD)Nos.1389 to 1391 of 2014 Dated:

10.07.2023

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.