VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2025 › High Court of Madras

Annalakshmi @ Sakilabanu v. The State of Tamil Nadu

ALLOWED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
22 July 2025
Bench
P.Vadamalaiauthor
Case no.
CRL MP(MD) 9486/2025

Follow Madras High CourtFollow P.Vadamalai

Judgment

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 22/07/2025 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. VADAMALAI in CRL OP(MD).No.9419 of 2025 Annalakshmi @ Sakilabanu, W/o.Raja,

... Petitioner/Petitioner

Vs The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep by the Inspector of Police, Theppakulam Police Station, Madurai City, Madurai District. Crime No.123/2025. ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : Mr.P.Karthick

Advocate. For Respondent : Mr.M.Karunanithi,

Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR MODIFICATION Under Sec.528 of BNSS PRAYER :- To modify the condition No.6(c) imposed in Crl.OP(MD).No.9419 of 2025 dated 10.06.2025. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- This petition has been filed to modify the condition No.6(c) imposed in Crl.OP

(MD).No.9419 of 2025 dated 10.06.2025.

¶2The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has filed an anticipatory bail application before this Court on 04.06.2025 in Crl.OP.(MD). No.9419 of 2025. The said anticipatory bail petition was heard and on 10.06.2025, this Hon'ble Court was pleased to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions. In the said anticipatory bail order, Condition No.6(c) as follows: ''(c). The petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30a.m. until further orders.''

¶3He further submits that the petitioner is the daily wager and due to the harassment of the respondent police the petitioner seeks modification of the condition imposed in the order dated 10.06.2025. The petitioner is ready to comply the condition before the All Women Police Station, Madurai Town. Due to the harassment made by the respondent police, the petitioner is afraid to complying the said condition before the respondent police station. Therefore, the petitioner seek indulgence of this court by modifying the said condition imposed against her. Hence, he prays for modification of the said condition.

¶4The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) appearing for the respondent would submit that the respondent police have not made any harassment against the petitioner. He raised objection to allow this Criminal Miscellaneous Petition.

¶5Considering the submissions made by the learned Counsel for the Petitioner and being satisfied with the reasons stated above, this Court is inclined to modify the Condition No.6(c) in the order made in Crl.O.P(MD).No.9419 of 2025 dated 10.06.2025. Accordingly, Condition No.6(c) is modified as ''(c). The petitioner shall appear and sign before the Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Madurai Town, Madurai daily at 10.30a.m. until further orders.'' . The other conditions shall remain unaltered.

¶6With the above said modification, this Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is allowed. sd/- 22/07/2025

/ TRUE COPY /

/08/2025

Sub-Assistant Registrar (CS-I/II/III/IV)

Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,

Madurai - 625 023. gvn To

¶1The Judicial Magistrate No.I, Madurai District.

2.Do through the chief judicial Magistrate, madurai

3.The Inspector of Police, Theppakulam Police Station, Madurai City.

4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. Copy to The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Madurai Town, Madurai. ORDER IN CRL MP(MD) No.9486 of 2025 IN CRL OP(MD) No.9419 of 2025 Date :22/07/2025

PR/06.08.2025 4P/6C Madurai Bench of Madras High Court is issuing certified copies in this format from 17/07/2023

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.