VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Kasimayan.M v. The Tahsildar

CLOSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
1 August 2023
Bench
B.Pugalendhiauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 18567/2023

Judgment

ORDER The petitioner has submitted an application dated 24.11.2022 to the respondent, seeking for correction of wrong entries made in the revenue records. Since the said application has not been considered, the present writ petition has been filed.

¶2Mr.G.V.Vairam Santhosh, learned Additional Government Pleader, who takes notice for the respondents, on instructions, submits that there was some error with regard to the survey number in the revenue records. In this regard, enquiry was conducted and necessary orders would be passed within a period of two weeks.

¶3Recording the submission of the learned Additional Government Pleader, this writ petition is closed. No costs.

01.08.2023 ogy NCC : Yes / No. Index : Yes / No. Internet : Yes / No. To The Tahsildar, Nilakottai Taluk, Dindigul Disrict.

B.PUGALENDHI, J. ogy

01.08.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 01.08.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI M.Kasimayan ... Petitioner versus The Tahsildar, Nilakottai Taluk, Dindigul Disrict. ... Respondent Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondent to conclude the enquiry and pass final orders in connection with the enquiry initiated by proceedings of the respondent in Na.Ka.No. 9528/2022/s, within the time that may be stipulated by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Mahaboob Athiff For Respondent : Mr.G.V.Vairam Santhosh, Additional Govt. Pleader

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.