VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

B.Dhanabalan, v. The Chairman, Tn Small

DISMISSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
5 October 2023
Bench
B.Pugalendhiauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 11489/2014

Judgment

O R D E R

The petitioner, who is a Hollow Block manufacturer having his unit in Shop No.33 at SIDCO, Urapuli, Paramakudi Taluk with an intention to extend his business has made a request for allotment of shop No.40 in the SIDCO Industries, Urapuli, Paramakudi Taluk, Ramathapuram District and his request was rejected. As against the same, this writ petition was filed by him in the year 2014.

2.Today(05.10.2023), when this writ petition is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the respondent SIDCO submits that the shop No.40 has already been allotted to the third respondent herein and therefore the petitioner's application cannot be considered.

3.Considering that the shop required by the petitioner has already been allotted to an another person, this writ petition is dismissed as no relief can be granted to this petitioner. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.

05.10.2023 NCC: Yes/No Index:Yes/No Internet:Yes vrn To

1.The Chairman, Tamil Nadu Small Industries Development Corporation Ltd., Thiru.Vi.Ka. Industrial Estate, Near SIDCO Electronics Complex, Guindy, Chennai 32.

2.The Branch Manager, SIDCO Thondi Road, Sivagangai.

B.PUGALENDHI, J. vrn

05.10.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 05.10.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI B.Dhanabalan, ... Petitioner Vs 1.The Chairman, Tamil Nadu Small Industries Development Corporation Ltd., Thiru.Vi.Ka. Industrial Estate, Near SIDCO Electronics Complex, Guindy, Chennai 32. 2.The Branch Manager, SIDCO Thondi Road, Sivagangai. 3.M.Suresh, M/s Paramakudi Engineering Cluster (Pvt) Ltd., No.3/51-H Sidco Industrial Estate, Thelichathanallur Panchayat, Paramakudi, Ramanathapuram District. ...Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records pertaining to the first respondent's proceedings in RC No. 4159/1E-1C/2012 dated 01.06.2012 and quash the same in respect of Developed Plot No. 40, SIDCO Industries, Urapuli, Paramakudi Taluk , Ramathapuram District and consequently direct the first respondent to allot the said Developed Plot No. 40 in favour of the petitioner in accordance with law. For Petitioner : Mr.K.Sudalayandi For R1 : No appearance For R2 : Mr.T.Sakthi Kumaran For R3 : Mr.S.Srinivasa Raghavan

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.