VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2025 › High Court of Madras

Chelladurai .S v. The State of Tamilnadu

ALLOWED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
16 October 2025
Bench
G.R.Swaminathanauthor, B.Pugalendhi
Case no.
WP(MD) 18728/2023

Follow Madras High CourtFollow G.R.SwaminathanFollow B.Pugalendhi

Judgment

O R D E R Heard both sides.

¶2The petitioner is a resident of Tenkasi District. He challenges the impugned proceedings dated 05.07.2023 issued by the District Collector in favour that the 10th respondent permitting him to quarry sand from the petition-mentioned water body. The District Collector had issued the impugned proceedings dated 05.07.2023 granting permission under Rule 12 of the Tamil Nadu Minor Minerals Rules.

¶3A bare look on the records cited in the impugned order would indicate that the tenth respondent has given application as early as on 04.06.2014. The Assistant Director of Geology and Mining, Tirunelveli gave his report dated 13.06.2015. The matter was left in limbo for several years. Only on 05.07.2023, permission was granted. This Court had earlier indicated that without ascertaining the quality of the mineral, permission cannot be mechanically granted under Rule 12. In the case on hand, the authority had stated that sand has ben permitted to be quarried for the purpose of sale as well as public 4 W.P.(MD)NO.18728 OF 2023 distribution. In other words, it is not an order to favour an agriculturist for own purpose. On the other hand, commercial exploitation has been allowed. It is well settled that in such cases, license can be issued only through public auction. The impugned order has been arbitrarily issued in gross infraction of the mandate set out in Article 14 of the Constitution of India. We fail to understand as to how the application given in 2014 can be allowed nine years later in July 2023. The impugned order is quashed. This writ petition stands allowed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. (G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J.) & (B.PUGALENDHI, J.) 16th October 2025

NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No PMU To:

¶1The Secretary, Tamil Nadu Natural Resources Department, St.George Fort, Chennai-9.

¶2The Member Secretary, 5 W.P.(MD)NO.18728 OF 2023 State Level Environment Impact Assessment Authority, 3rd Floor, Panagal Maligai, Saidapet, Chennai – 15.

¶3The District Collector, Tenkasi District, Tenkasi.

¶4The Assistant Director of Mines and Geology,

¶5The Revenue Divisional Officer, O/o.the Revenue Divisional Officer, Tenkasi, Tenkasi District.

¶6The Tahsildar, Kadayanallur Taluk, Tenkasi District.

¶7The Executive Engineer, Public Works Department(Water Resource Organization), Upper Vaippar Basin Division, Rajapalayam, Virudhunagar District.

¶8The Block Development Officer, Vasudevanallur Panchayat Union,

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. AND

B.PUGALENDHI, J. PMU 6 W.P.(MD)NO.18728 OF 2023 W.P.(MD)No.18728 of 2023

16.10.2025

Case details

Parties and counsel

1 W.P.(MD)NO.18728 OF 2023 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 16.10.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI W.P.(MD)No.18728 of 2023 AND W.M.P.(MD)Nos.15543, 15544 and 15546 of 2023 S.Chelladurai ... Petitioner / Petitioner Vs. 1. The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Secretary, Tamil Nadu Natural Resources Department, St.George Fort, Chennai-9. 2. The Member Secretary, State Level Environment Impact Assessment Authority, 3rd Floor, Panagal Maligai, Saidapet, Chennai – 15. 3. The District Collector, Tenkasi District, Tenkasi. 4. The Assistant Director of Mines and Geology, 5. The Revenue Divisional Officer, O/o.the Revenue Divisional Officer, Tenkasi, Tenkasi District. 6. The Tahsildar, Kadayanallur Taluk, Tenkasi District. 2 W.P.(MD)NO.18728 OF 2023 7. The Executive Engineer, Public Works Department(Water Resource Organization), Upper Vaippar Basin Division, Rajapalayam, Virudhunagar District. 8. The Block Development Officer, Vasudevanallur Panchayat Union, 9. The Commissioner, Puliyankudi Municipality, 10. S.Paramasivan ... Respondents/ Respondents Prayer: Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records pertaining to the impugned order in M1/21696/2014 dated 05.07.2023 on the file of the third respondent and quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.K.Jeyamohan For Respondents : Mr.R.Baskaran, Additional Advocate General, assisted by, Mr.C.Venkatesh Kumar, Special Government Pleader for R-1 to R-8. Mr.M.Rajarajan for R-9. * * * 3 W.P.(MD)NO.18728 OF 2023

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.