VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

J. Anthony Muthu, S/O. Jebamal v. The District Collector

CLOSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
20 April 2023
Bench
B.Pugalendhiauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 12962/2014

Judgment

ORDER This writ petition is filed by the petitioner challenging the work order issued to the sixth respondent for construction of a bus stand.

2.Learned Additional Government Pleader, on instructions, submitted that the order impugned dated 10.07.2014 has subsequently been cancelled by the District Collector. He has also produced a copy of the proceedings addressed by the Commissioner dated 31.03.2023.

3.Recording the aforesaid submission, this writ petition stands closed as no further order is required to be passed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. Index :

20.04.2023 NCC : Internet : gk To

1.The District Collector and Chairman, District Rural Development Agency, Tuticorin District, Tuticorin.

2.The Block Development Officer, O/o.the Block Development Officer,

3.The Commissioner, Vilathikulam Panchayat Union, O/o.Vilathikulam Panchayat Union,

4.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Kovilpatti,

5.The Tahsildar, O/o.Tahsildar,

B.PUGALENDHI, J. gk

20.04.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 20.04.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI and MP(MD)Nos.1 & 2 of 2014 J.Anthony Muthu ... Petitioner v. 1.The District Collector and Chairman, District Rural Development Agency, Tuticorin District, Tuticorin. 2.The Block Development Officer, O/o.the Block Development Officer, 3.The Commissioner, Vilathikulam Panchayat Union, O/o.Vilathikulam Panchayat Union, 4.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Kovilpatti, 5.The Tahsildar, O/o.Tahsildar, 6.The Panchayat President, Soorangudi Panchayat, Vilathikulam Taluk, 7.R.Gunasekaran 8.R.Vasuki ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records of the impugned order dated 10.07.2014 made in A5/3526/2013 on the file of the first respondent and set aside the same. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Rajasekar For Respondents : Mr.G.V.Vairam Santhosh Additional Government Pleader for RR.1, 2, 4 & 5 No appearance for RR.3, 6 Mr.T.K.Gopalan for RR.7, 8 *****

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.