P. Santhanamari, v. The District Revenue

ORDER Heard the learned counsel on either side.

2.It is not in dispute that the civil proceedings instituted by the writ petitioner in respect of the petition mentioned lands ended against her. In these circumstances, the question of interfering with the impugned order does not arise and the writ petition is dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

10.07.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No ias To:-

1.The District Revenue Officer and District Additional Magistrate, Tuticorin District, Tuticorin.

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Revenue Divisional Office, Tuticorin.

3.The Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Tuticorin.

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. ias

10.07.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 10.07.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN and M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2014 P.Santhanamari ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Revenue Officer and District Additional Magistrate, Tuticorin District, Tuticorin. 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Revenue Divisional Office, Tuticorin. 3.The Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Tuticorin. 4.Chinnadurai ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the Proceedings in Na.Ka.D/3/52835/2012 dated 18.06.2014 on the file of the District Revenue Officer, the 1st Respondent and quash the same and consequently direct him to consider the case of the Petitioner afresh on merits. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Siva Thilakar For Respondents : Mr.N.GA.Nataraj, Government Advocate for R1 to R3. Mr.G.Mohankumar for R4.