M.Indrachith v. The State of Tamilnadu

ORDER When the writ petition came up for hearing today, learned Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the relief sought for has become infructuous and as such, nothing survives for further adjudication. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.

2.In view of the above submission and the endorsement so made, this writ petition stands dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Index : Yes / No

10.04.2023 NCC : Yes / No gk To

1.The Home Secretary, State of Tamil Nadu, Department of Home, Secretariat, St.George Fort, Chennai – 9.

2.The Director General of Police, Dr.Radhakrishnan Salai, Mylapur, Chennai.

B.PUGALENDHI, J. gk

10.04.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 10.04.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI M.Indrachith ... Petitioner v. 1.The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by the Home Secretary, Department of Home, Secretariat, St.George Fort, Chennai – 9. 2.The Director General of Police, O/o.Director General of Police, Dr.Radhakrishnan Salai, Mylapur, Chennai. 3.M.Karunakaran 4.Sumith Saran 5.Manickam 6.Jeyabal ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 & 2 to take necessary action as against the respondents 3 to 6 as per Section 4 of the Schedule Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, within a stipulated time limit. For Petitioner : Mr.I.Pinaygash For Respondents : Mr.G.V.Vairam Santhosh Additional Government Pleader for R.1, R.2 *****