VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Rajan .K v. The Thasildar Cum 2Nd Class Executive Magistrate

ALLOWED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
10 August 2023
Bench
B.Pugalendhiauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 18787/2023

Judgment

ORDER The petitioner has preferred an appeal on 28.06.2017 before the Revenue Divisional Officer, Theni as against the order of the Tahsildar. However the appeal is not yet disposed of. Therefore, this writ petition is filed for a direction for disposal of the appeal.

2.The learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents submits that the Thasildar has passed orders based on the decree granted by the Civil Court and the appeal filed by the petitioner is pending before the 2nd respondent.

3.Considering that the appeal filed by the petitioner in the year 2017 is kept pending without any progress, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the 2nd respondent to dispose of the appeal filed by the petitioner within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs.

10.08.2023 dsk To

1.The Tahsildar cum 2nd Class Executive Magistrate, Theni District, Theni.

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Periyakulam, Theni District.

B.PUGALENDHI, J. dsk

10.08.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 10.08.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI K.Rajan ... Petitioner Vs 1.The Tahsildar cum 2nd Class Executive Magistrate, Theni District, Theni. 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Periyakulam, Theni District. ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ of mandamus, directing the 2nd respondent to dispose and pass final order in the appeal in Na.Ka.No.3070/2017/A3, dated 28.06.2017 within a time frame as stipulated by this Court For petitioner : Mr.S.Ramasamy For Respondents : Mr.M.Sarangan, Additional Government Pleader

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.