- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 4 August 2023
- Bench
- B.Pugalendhi
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 18965/2023
Judgment
ORDER The petitioner with a grievance that her application for grant of patta has not been considered by the respondent has filed this writ petition.
2.The learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondent on instruction submits that the petitioner's application is under process and orders would be passed within a reasonable time.
3.In view of the above, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent to pass suitable orders on merits and in accordance with law within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs.
04.08.2023 dsk To The Tahsildar, Nilakottai, Dindigul District.
B.PUGALENDHI, J. dsk
04.08.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 04.08.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI Sudha ... Petitioner Vs The Tahsildar, Nilakottai, Dindigul District. ... Respondent PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ of mandamus, directing the respondent to issue patta on the basis of the petitioner's online application for patta transfer vide Can No.133251120251505 and application No.2023/0105/13/341763 dated 06.05.2023 in respect of the property in Survey Nos. 31/2B, 32/2A, 32/2B, 32/2D, 32/3, 32-9A, 33/2C, 33/4, 33/5A, 33/5B, 33/5C, 33/1B2, 45/1B, 45/1D and 45/4 situated at Sekkapatti Village, Nilakottai Taluk, Dindigul District. For petitioner : Mr.S.Ramasamy For Respondent : Mr.GV.Vairam Santhosh, Additional Government Pleader
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.