- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 3 July 2023
- Bench
- G.R.Swaminathan
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 14431/2014
Judgment
ORDER The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the matter has become infructuous and nothing survives for further adjudication in this writ petition.
2.Recording the said submission, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
03.07.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No ias To:-
1.The District Revenue Officer, Madurai District, Madurai.
2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Usilampatti Taluk, Madurai District.
3.The Tahsildar, Usilampatti Taluk, Madurai District.
G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. ias
03.07.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 03.07.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN and M.P.(MD)No.3 of 2014 1.M.Kothalam 2.Thangammal ... Petitioners Vs. 1.The District Revenue Officer, Madurai District, Madurai. 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Usilampatti Taluk, Madurai District. 3.The Tahsildar, Usilampatti Taluk, Madurai District. 4.Seetharaman ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records relating to the impugned orders vide Na.Ka.No.46588/2013/G2 dated 25.7.2014 passed by the 1st respondent r/w the order vide Mu.Mu.No.720/2013/A2 dated 03.07.2013 passed by the 2nd respondent and quash the same. For Petitioners : Mr.R.Senthil Kumar For Respondents : Mrs.K.Christy Theboral, Addl. Government Pleader for R1 to R3. Mr.S.Ramasamy for R4.
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.