VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

A.Gopikannan, S/O C.Ayyadurai v. The Govt. of Tamil Nadu,

CLOSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
11 October 2023
Bench
S.M. Subramaniamauthor, V. Lakshminarayanan
Case no.
WP(MD) 14594/2014

Judgment

Order dated 16.04.2019)

9.The Union of India, Rep. by its Secretary, Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment, A – Wing, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi – 110 001.

10.The Union of India, Represented by the Secretary, Department of Personnel and Training, North Block, New Delhi – 110 001. ...Respondents (R9 and R10 suo motu impleaded vide Court Order dated 11.11.2020 made in W.P.(MD) No. 14594 of 2014 by NKKJ and BPJ) PRAYER:- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records in respect of Na.Ka.No.355/11/A4 dated 05.03.2014 issued by the 3rd respondent and quash the same and direct the 1 to 3 respondents to immediately give reemployment in any of the suitable post on permanent basis as per Act 1995 taking into consideration of the status of the Disabled petitioner and his family backgrounds and his contributions in the national and international sports and athletic and his achievements in various skill like welder, computer operator, painter and trainer of sports and athletic department of school and colleges along with the monitory benefit of regular post with areas of payment along with interest and the cost of this petition. For Petitioner : No appearance For Respondents : Mr.T.Amjadkhan Government Advocate R1 to R4, R6 and R8 Mr.K.Azhagu Raman for R5 **** ORDER (Order of the Court was made by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.) Learned Government Advocate appearing on behalf of the respondents 1 to 4, 6 and 8 made a submission that during the pendency of the Writ Petition, the petitioner was appointed by the District Collector as Office Assistant in proceedings dated 02.08.2019 and on completion of two years of service probation was also declared and now the petitioner is the permanent member of the Service.

¶2That being the factum, the Writ Petition stands closed. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. [S.M.S.J.,] & [V.L.N.J.,] NCC :Yes/No

11.10.2023 Index :Yes/No SJ To

1.The Chief Secretary,

2.The Madurai District Collector, Chairman of District Supply and Marketing Society, (Mahalir Thittam) /District Rural Development Agency, Madurai – 20.

3.The Joint Director / Project Officer, TNWDP (Mahalir Thittam), Project Implementation Unit, New Natham Road, Near to Reserveline Bus Stop, Madurai – 14.

4.The State Commissioner for Differently Abled Persons, State Commissioner Office, K.K.Nager, Chennai – 78.

5.The Secretary, Ministry of Youth Affairs and Sports, Government of India, New Delhi.

6.The Secretary, Sports Development Authority,

7.The Chief Electoral Officer, Public (Elections) Department, Fort St.George, Chennai – 600 009.

8.The Secretary, Youth Welfare and Sports Development, Namakkal Kavignar Maaligai, Fort St. George, Chennai – 600 009.

9.The Secretary, Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment, Union of India, A – Wing, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi – 110 001.

10.The Union of India, Represented by the Secretary, Department of Personnel and Training, North Block, New Delhi – 110 001.

S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J. AND

V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN, J. SJ

11.10.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 11.10.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN A.Gopikannan ...Petitioner -Vs.- 1.The Govt. of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Chief Secretary, 2.The Madurai District Collector, Chairman of District Supply and Marketing Society, (Mahalir Thittam) /District Rural Development Agency, Madurai – 20. 3.The Joint Director / Project Officer, TNWDP (Mahalir Thittam), Project Implementation Unit, New Natham Road, Near to Reserveline Bus Stop, Madurai – 14. 4.The State Commissioner for Differently Abled Persons, State Commissioner Office, K.K.Nager, Chennai – 78. 5.The Government of India, Represented by its Secretary, Ministry of Youth Affairs and Sports, New Delhi. 6.The Secretary, Sports Development Authority, (R5 & 6 are suo motu impleaded vide Court Order dated 08/03/19). 7.The Chief Electoral Officer, Public (Elections) Department, Fort St.George, Chennai – 600 009. 8.The Secretary, Youth Welfare and Sports Development, Namakkal Kavignar Maaligai, Fort St. George, Chennai – 600 009. (R7 and R8 are suo motu impleaded vide Court

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.