- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 17 November 2023
- Bench
- M. Sundar, R.Sakthivel
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 14809/2014
Judgment
O R D E R [Order of the Court was made by M.SUNDAR, J.] Matter mentioned at half past ten.
¶2Mr.S.Rajasekar, learned counsel of M/s.T.Lajapathi Roy & Associates [Law Firm], counsel on record submitted that the captioned matter has become infructuous and learned counsel has made an endorsement in the case file. A scanned reproduction of the same is as follows: Page No.3 of 6
¶3In the light of the narrative thus far, captioned Writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn / closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. (M.S., J.) (R.S.V., J.)
17.11.2023 Index : Yes / No : Yes / No vsm Page No.4 of 6 To
1.The Principal Secretary, State of Tamil Nadu, Department of Higher Education, Fort St. George, Chennai.
2.The Vice-Chancellor, Madurai – 21.
3.Dr.Kalyani Mathivanan, Vice-Chancellor, Madurai – 21.
4.Madurai Kamaraj University, Rep. By the Registrar, Madurai – 625 021. Page No.5 of 6 W.P(MD)No.14809oofo2014 M.SUNDAR,oJ. and R.SAKTHIVEL,oJ. vsmoo ORDERoMADEoIN W.P(MD)No.14809oofo2014 DATEDo:o17.11.2023 PageoNo.6oofo6
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 17.11.2023 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.SUNDAR and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SAKTHIVEL and M.P.(MD)Nos.2 to 4 of 2014 P.Vijayakumar ... Petitioner vs. 1.The Chancellor of Madurai Kamaraj University, Raj Bhavan, Guindy, Chennai – 600 022. (R1 deleted as per order dated 08.09.2014 in W.P.(MD)No.14809 of 2014) 2.The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep by its Principal Secretary, Department of Higher Education, Fort St. George, Chennai. 3.The Vice-Chancellor, Madurai – 21. 4.Dr.Kalyani Mathivanan, Vice-Chancellor, Madurai – 21. Page No.1 of 6 5.Madurai Kamaraj University, Rep. By the Registrar, Madurai – 625 021. 6.Dr.N.Rajasekar, The Registrar, Madurai 21. ... Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records pertaining to the impugned item Nos.33 and 34 of the approved Minutes of the Syndicate in Reference No.ME-1/Syn-AM/May/2014-3 dated 16.06.2014 on the file of the respondent No.5 and quash the same as illegal and consequently for a direction, directing the respondent No.5 to withdraw all the appointments made in pursuance of the impugned item Nos.33 and 34 of the Approved Minutes of the Syndicate dated 29.05.2014. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Rajasekar For Respondents : Mr.M.Senthil Ayyanar, Government Advocate for R2 Mr.R.Vignesh for Mr.T.Sakthi Kumaran for R3 & R5 Mr.Raguvaran Gopalan for R4 No Appearance for R6 R1- Deleted Page No.2 of 6
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.