VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Anjali v. The Thashildar

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
3 August 2023
Bench
B.Pugalendhiauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 18850/2023

Judgment

ORDER The petitioner has submitted an application dated 30.06.2023 to the respondent, requesting him to survey his land and filed this writ petition immediately, that his application has not been considered by the respondent.

¶2Mr.G.V.Vairam Santhosh, learned Additional Government Pleader, who takes notice for the respondent, on instructions, submits that the petitioner's application is under process and it would be considered on seniority basis within a reasonable time.

¶3Considering the submission made by the learned Additional Government Pleader that the application has been made only on

30.06.2023 and it is under process, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent to conduct survey, after issuing notice to the adjacent land owners and conclude the same, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶4With the above direction, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs.

03.08.2023 ogy NCC : Yes / No. Index : Yes / No. Internet : Yes / No. To The Thashildar, Thirumayam Taluk, Pudukottai District.

B.PUGALENDHI, J. ogy

03.08.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 03.08.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI Anjalai ... Petitioner versus The Thashildar, Thirumayam Taluk, Pudukottai District. ... Respondent Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondent to survey and demarcate the petitioner's property in Survey Nos.192/16 and 192/8, Karamangalam Revenue Village, Thirumayam Taluk, Pudukottai District within a stipulated time fixed by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Mahaboob Athiff For Respondent : Mr.G.V.Vairam Santhosh, Additional Government Pleader

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.