VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2025 › High Court of Madras

Srikanth v. The State of Tamilnadu, Rep. by the Inspector of Police,

ALLOWED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
24 July 2025
Bench
P.Vadamalaiauthor
Case no.
CRL MP(MD) 9626/2025

Follow Madras High CourtFollow P.Vadamalai

Judgment

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 24/07/2025 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. VADAMALAI in CRL OP(MD).No.10053 of 2025 Srikanth, S/o.Pramaiya,

... Petitioner/Petitioner

Vs The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep by the Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Nanguneri, Tirunelveli District. Crime No.16/2025. ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : Mr.N.Balasubramanian

Advocate. For Respondent : Mr.M.Karunanithi

Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR MODIFICATION Under Sec.528 of BNSS PRAYER :- To modify the condition No.6(c) imposed in Crl.OP(MD).No.10053 of 2025 dated 02.07.2025. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- This petition has been filed to modify the condition No.6(c) imposed in Crl.OP

(MD).No.10053 of 2025 dated 02.07.2025.

¶2The learned Counsel for the petitioner would submit that this petitioner has filed an anticipatory bail petition before this Court on 12.06.2025 in Crl.OP.(MD). No.10053 of 2025. The said anticipatory bail petition was heard and on 02.07.2025, this Hon'ble Court was pleased to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions. In the said bail order, Condition No.6(c) as follows: ''(c). The petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30a.m. until further orders.''

¶3He further submits that this petitioner is a college going student, he has pursuing his U.G. Degree at Jesu Arts and Science College at Alangudi, Pudukottai District. In order to comply the said condition, this petitioner travelled around 250Kms from his home town, and his college education will be spoiled in the event of continuous absence. Therefore, the petitioner seeks indulgence of this court by modifying the said condition imposed against him. Hence, he prays for modification of the said condition.

¶4The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) appearing for the respondent has not raised any objection to allow this Criminal Miscellaneous Petition.

¶5Considering the submissions made by the learned Counsel for the Petitioner and being satisfied with the reasons stated above, this Court is inclined to modify the Condition No.6(c) in the order made in Crl.O.P(MD).No.10053 of 2025 dated

02.07.2025. Accordingly, Condition No.6(c) is modified as ''(c). This petitioner shall appear and sign before the Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Pudukottai daily at 6.30p.m. until further orders.''. The other conditions shall remain unaltered.

¶6With the above said modification, this Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is allowed. sd/- 24/07/2025

/ TRUE COPY /

/2025

Sub-Assistant Registrar ( C.S. I / II / III / IV )

Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,

Madurai - 625 023.

gvn To

¶1The Judicial Magistrate, Nanguneri, Tirunelveli District.

2.The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Nanguneri, Tirunelveli District.

3.The Inspector of Police, All Women Police, Station, Pudukottai.

4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. ORDER IN CRL MP(MD) No.9626 of 2025 Date :24/07/2025 AS/29.08.2025/4P/5C Madurai Bench of Madras High Court is issuing certified copies in this format from 17/07/2023.

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.