Murugan .C v. The District Collector

ORDER When the writ petition is taken up for hearing, the learned Counsel appearing for petitioner submits that the writ petition has become infructuous and he has also made an endorsement so.

2.Recording the above submission and the endorsement, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.

29.08.2023 Internet : Yes / No To

1.The District Collector, Ramanathapuram, Ramanathapuram District.

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Paramakudi Sub Division, Ramanathapuram District.

3.The Tahsildar, Kamuthi Taluk, Ramanathapuram District.

B.PUGALENDHI, J. dsk

29.08.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated: 29.08.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI C.Murugan ... Petitioner Vs 1.The District Collector, Ramanathapuram, Ramanathapuram District. 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Paramakudi Sub Division, Ramanathapuram District. 3.The Tahsildar, Kamuthi Taluk, Ramanathapuram District. 4.Ramar 5.Malaichamy 6.Mari 4.Malaichamy ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of writ of mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 3 to effectively conduct peace meeting with regard to the conduct of the Malaiyamman Temple, Senthanenthal Village, Kamuthi Taluk and to allow the petitioner to conduct the Kumbabishekam on 22.08.2023 and 23.08.2023. For Petitioner : Mr.A.Balaji For Respondent : Ms.D.Farjana Ghousia, Nos.1 to 3 Special Government Pleader For Respondent : No representation Nos.4 to 7