M.Selvaraju Nadar, v. The District Registrar,

ORDER Check slip dated 26.08.2014 and the memo dated 03.09.2014 are put to challenge in this writ petition. By the impugned orders, the Sub-Registrar, Nazareth, has directed the petitioner to produce separate patta in his name for registering the document in Survey No.317/17, to an extent of 33.0 hectares that it stands in the name of Johnson, Paulraj, Thangaraj, Jeyaraj, Dharmaraj and Samuvel.

¶2The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that he is not in a position to contact the petitioner.

¶3However, the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents, on written instructions, submits that pending this writ petition, the petitioner has obtained a separate patta and the document was also registered. He claims that the petitioner has informed the Sub Registrar, Nazareth, that he is not willing to pursue this writ petition and gave a statement to him.

¶5Recording the submission made by the learned Additional Government Pleader, this writ petition is closed as no further order is required. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

16.03.2023 ogy NCC : Yes / No. Index : Yes / No. Internet: Yes / No.

B.PUGALENDHI, J. ogy To

¶1The District Registrar, Palayamkottai, Tirunelveli District.

¶2The Sub-Registrar, 109/19, Markeshius Street, Nazareth, Thoothukudi, Thoothukudi District.

16.03.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 16.03.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI and M.P.(MD)Nos.1 and 2 of 2014 M.Selvaraju Nadar ... Petitioner versus 1. The District Registrar, Palayamkottai, Tirunelveli District. 2. The Sub-Registrar, 109/19, Markeshius Street, Nazareth, Thoothukudi, Thoothukudi District. ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for the issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the Check Slip dated 26.08.2014 bearing proceeding No.Nil, on the file of the 2nd respondent pertaining to rejection of registration of the sale deed and its consequential order passed in No.4008/A1/2014 dated 03.09.2014, on the file of the 1st respondent and quash both the proceedings as illegal and further direct the respondents to register the two sale deed, both dated 26.08.2014 executed in the favour of the petitioner. For Petitioner : Mr.K.R.Laxman For Respondents : Mr.G.V.Vairam Santhosh, Additional Government Pleader