Ramasamy(Died), Amutha, v. The District Revenue Officer,

ORDER Heard the learned counsel on either side.

¶2The petitioner challenges the order effecting mutation of patta in favour of the third respondent. During the pendency of the writ petition, civil suit filed by the petitioner as well as the counter claim therein suffered dismissal. Aggrieved by the same, A.S.Nos.106 of 2017 and 13 of 2018 have been filed before the Sub Court, Sivagangai. The rights of the parties will abide by the outcome of the said first appeals. There is no interference is interfere with the impugned order at this stage.

¶3This writ petition is disposed of accordingly. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

11.07.2023 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No NCC : Yes / No MGA To

1.The District Revenue Officer, Sivagangai District, Sivagangai.

2.The Tahsildar, Sivagangai Taluk, Sivagangai District.

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. MGA

11.07.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 11.07.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN and W.M.P(MD)No.2 of 2014 Ramasamy (Died) Amutha (Petitioner is substituted vide order of this Court dated 17.03.2023) ... Petitioner Vs 1.The District Revenue Officer, Sivagangai District, Sivagangai. 2.The Tahsildar, Sivagangai Taluk, Sivagangai District. 3.Sekar ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records in pursuance to the first respondent impugned order passed in Pa.Mu.No.B4/32006/2007 dated 31.05.2007 and quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.J.John For Respondents : Mr.D.Gandhiraj Special Government Pleader for R.1 & R.2 Mr.S.Srinivasa Raghavan for R.3