VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

C.Irudhaya Sundararaj v. F.T.Jose,

DISMISSED FOR NON-PROSECUTION
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
2 June 2023
Bench
P.Vadamalaiauthor
Case no.
CRP(MD) 1053/2018

Judgment

ORDER This Civil Revision Petition is filed to setaside the impugned order dated 08.11.2017 passed in I.A.No.3 of 2016 in O.S.No.3 of 2016 by the Principal District Munsif, Dindigul.

¶2When the revision was taken up for hearing on 25.04.2023, there was no representation for the petitioner and therefore, the case was directed to be listed today (02.06.2023) under the caption 'for dismissal'. Even today, there is no representation for petitioner. Therefore, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed for non prosecution. No costs. Consequently connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

02.06.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No vsd To

1.The Principal District Munsif, Dindigul.

2.The Section Officer, Vernacular Records, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

P.VADAMALAI, J. vsd

and C.M.P(MD)No.4531 of 2018

02.06.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 02.06.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.VADAMALAI and C.M.P(MD)No.4531 of 2018 C.Irudhaya Sundararaj ... Revision Petitioner/Plaintiff Vs. 1.F.T.Jose 2.A.Partholomia ... Respondents/Defendants PRAYER : Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India, to setaside the impugned order dated 08.11.2017 passed in I.A.No.3 of 2016 in O.S.No.3 of 2016 by the Principal District Munsif, Dindigul and allow this Civil Revision Petition. For Petitioner : No Appearance For Respondents : Mr.M.P.Senthil

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.