R.Singaravelan, v. The District Collector

ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the sole petitioner died and requested to pass appropriate orders.

¶2The statement of the learned counsel for the petitioner is placed on record.

3.1. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as abated.

3.2. No costs.

3.3. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

03.08.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes abr To

1.The District Collector, Virudhunagar District, Virudhunagar.

2.The Block Development Officer, Sattur Union, Virudhunagar District. W.P.(MD)oNo.10100oofo2018 BATTUoDEVANAND,oJ. abr W.P.(MD)oNo.10100oofo2018 Datedo:o03.08.2023 Pageo4oofo4

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 03.08.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND and W.M.P.(MD) No.12687 of 2020 R.Singaravelan .. Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, Virudhunagar District, Virudhunagar. 2.The Block Development Officer, Sattur Union, Virudhunagar District. .. Respondents Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the entire records pertaining to the proceedings of the 2nd respondent made in Na.Ka.P7/3067/2016 dated 21.03.2018 and quash the same and consequently directing the respondents to rectify of his service seniority and assign/place the petitioner at S.No.261 based on his initial entry into service. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Aravind Raj For Respondents : Mr.A.Kannan Additional Government Pleader