- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 22 September 2023
- Bench
- G.Ilangovan
- Case no.
- CRL OP(MD) 14292/2023
Judgment
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 22/09/2023 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.ILANGOVAN 1 GANESAN 2 MARIYAMMAL ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED -RANK NOT KNOWN Vs 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMAN POLICE STATION, SATTUR, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT. (CRIME NO.NOT KNOWN OF 2023) ... RESPONDENT No.1 / COMPLAINANT 2 M.KALEESWARI , ... RESPONDENT No.2 / DEFACTO-COMPLAINANT (R2 IS SUO -MOTU IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER OF THE COURT DATED 04.08.2023 IN CRL OP(MD)No.14292 of 2023) For Petitioner : Mr.R.MURUGAPPAN,
Advocate. For Respondent
: Mr.S.MANIKANDAN,
Government Advocate (Crl.Side) For Defacto Complainant : NO APPEARANCE. PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C. PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.Not Known of 2023 on the file of the Respondent Police. ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioners/Accused ranks not known, apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 498(A), 294
(b), 506(i) of I.P.C, in Crime No.Not Known of 2023 on the file of the respondent Police, seeks anticipatory bail.
¶2The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the matter has been compromised in the Mediation Centre. The terms and conditions of the settlement are follows:
(i) Both of the parties agreed to live together in a separate house near the parents of the defacto complainant/respondent Kaleeswari.
(ii) Kaleeswari agreed to live with the petitioner Sandiveeran on condition that he will abandon his drunken habit and never follow illegal relationship.
(iii) They are going to the house near the parents of the defacto complainant / respondent Kaleeswari today itself after a period of separation of three months.
(iv) Both of the parties agreed for reunion of their son with daughter-in-law.
¶3In view of the above said development, let the parties appear before the respondent Police and give statement regarding the above said compromise, so that the respondent can close the above said First Information Report.
¶4With the above said direction, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed as infructuous.
sd/-
22/09/2023
/ TRUE COPY /
/10/2023
Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S. )
Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,
Madurai - 625 023. INDU TO
¶1THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMAN POLICE STATION, SATTUR, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT.
¶2THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. . +1 CC to M/s.R.MURUGAPPAN, Advocate ( SR-14125[I] dated 25/09/2023 ) ORDER IN Date :22/09/2023 SA/JGB/SAR. /03.10.2023/3P/4C Madurai Bench of Madras High Court is issuing certified copies in this format from 17/07/2023.
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.