VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Sheik Abdul Kadhar .M v. The District Collector

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
17 August 2023
Bench
B.Pugalendhiauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 20036/2023

Judgment

ORDER The petitioners have submitted an application on 13.04.2021 to the 3rd respondent requesting him to remove the name of Sheik Saibu from the existing patta and issue joint patta in their favour in respect of the land in Survey No.431/2. Since the said application has not been considered, the present writ petition has been filed.

¶2The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the petitioners' application was enquired by the 3rd respondent, who in turn, forwarded the same to the 2nd respondent/the Revenue Divisional Officer, Dindigul, on 29.07.2022 itself. Ever after the recommendation of the 3rd respondent, the 2nd respondent has not taken any decision on the petitioners' application. Hence, the petitioners are before this Court.

¶3Ms.D.Farjana Ghoushia, learned Special Government Pleader, who takes notice for the respondents, on instructions, submits that the application of the petitioner is lying with the 2nd respondent and the same would be considered within a reasonable time.

¶4Considering the rival submissions made, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the second respondent to conclude the proceedings and pass necessary orders in accordance with law, within a period of 12 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs.

17.08.2023 ogy NCC : Yes / No. Index : Yes / No. Internet : Yes / No.

B.PUGALENDHI, J. ogy To

¶1The District Collector, Dindigul District, Collector Office, Dindigul.

¶2The Revenue Divisional Officer, Collector Office, Dindigul.

¶3The Tahsildar, Dindigul East, Office of Tahsildar, Dindigul.

17.08.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 17.08.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI 1. M.Sheik Abdul Kadhar 2. N.Sulthan Beevi 3. M.Sahul Hameed ... Petitioners versus 1. The District Collector, Dindigul District, Collector Office, Dindigul. 2. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Collector Office, Dindigul. 3. The Tahsildar, Dindigul East, Office of Tahsildar, Dindigul. ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents to remove the name of Sheik Saibu from the existing patta and to issue joint patta in the names of petitioners for the land covered in S.No.431/2 measuring about 60 cents in Anjukulipatti Village in Dindigul Taluk, Dindigul District. For Petitioners : Mr.A.R.Sethupathy For Respondents : Ms.D.Farjana Ghoushia, Special Government Pleader

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.