- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 4 July 2023
- Bench
- G.R.Swaminathan
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 16798/2014
Judgment
ORDER Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner.
¶2The prayer in the writ petition is for directing the respondent to consider the petitioner's claim for one time settlement. He also wants the benefit of the waiver scheme. The petitioner had availed a Tractor loan from the respondent.
¶3The prayer made in this writ petition cannot be entertained. It has been held in more than one case that it is not for the writ Court to direct the creditor bank to enter into one time settlement with the borrowers. The petitioner's remedy lies elsewhere.
¶4This writ petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs.
04.07.2023 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No NCC : Yes / No MGA
G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. MGA
04.07.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 04.07.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN N.Rajendran ... Petitioner Vs The Branch Manager State Bank of India, Eriyur Branch, Sivagangai District. ... Respondent Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to consider the Petitioner's claim for one time settlement with benefits of waiver scheme in connection with Account No. 30486226613 for Tractor Loan within the period prescribed by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Venkatesan For Respondent : No Appearance
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.