VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Elilan .J v. The Superintendent of Police

DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
18 December 2023
Bench
G.Ilangovanauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 20203/2023

Judgment

ORDER This writ petition has been filed in the nature of Mandamus, directing the 1st and 2nd respondents to remove the petitioner's name from the history sheet being maintained in the 3rd respondent police station as H.S.No. 108 of 2004 forthwith, pursuant to the representation made by the petitioner on 22.06.2023 to the 1st respondent.

2.When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) would submit that based on the representation given by the petitioner, after consideration the name of the petitioner deleted from the History Sheet maintained in the 3rd respondent Police Station. Now, the matter has now become infructuous.

3.Hence, this writ petition stands dismissed as infructuous. No costs.

18.12.2023 NCC :Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No PNM To

¶1The Superintendent of Police, Tirunelveli District.

¶2The Deputy Superintendent Of Police, Valliyoor Sub-Division, Tirunelveli District.

¶3The Inspector of Police, Uvari Police Station, Tirunelveli District.

4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. G.ILANGOVAN,J

PNM

ORDER IN W.P(MD).No.20203 of 2023

18.12.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 18.12.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN,J W.P(MD).No.20203 of 2023 J.Elilan ... Petitioner Vs 1. The Superintendent of Police, Tirunelveli District. 2. The Deputy Superintendent Of Police, Valliyoor Sub-Division, Tirunelveli District. 3. The Inspector of Police, Uvari Police Station, Tirunelveli District. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st and 2nd respondents to remove the petitioner's name from the history sheet being maintained in the 3rd respondent police station as H.S.No.108 of 2004 forthwith pursuant to the representation made by the petitioner on 22.06.2023 to the 1st respondent. For Petitioner : Mr. Anand R For Respondents : Mr.M.Sakthi Kumar (R1, R2) Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.