VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

M.Subbulakshmi v. The Special Deputy Collector Cum Chairman,

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
6 July 2026
Bench
C. Saravananauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 18799/2026

Judgment

ORDER This Writ Petition has been filed seeking for a direction to the 1st respondent to conduct an enquiry on his representation dated 05.06.2025 and take appropriate action against the respondents 5 to 13 for creating fraudulent document to grab the Pathway situated in Ward-3, Block-10, T.S.No.1072/1, 1074/2 and 1074/3, Perumalpatti Thropathiamman Kovil Street, Srivilliputhur, Virudhunagar District, in the light of G.O.(Nilai) No.119, Home (Police-II) Department dated 16.03.2023 as well as based on his representation dated

06.01.2025.

¶2The Writ Petition is disposed of at the time of admission after dispensing with the notice of the respondents 5 to 13 as there is no adverse order proposed to be passed against them at this stage.

¶3It appears that the petitioner had earlier approached this Court in W.P.

(MD) No.4802 of 2025. The Division Bench, by its order dated 21.02.2025, directed the respondent therein, namely, the first respondent, to consider the petitioner's representation dated 06.01.2025. The 5th respondent was the 3rd respondent in the said petition. The grievance of the petitioner is that, during the pendency of the enquiry before the 1st respondent, the 5th respondent has annexed a public pathway purportedly based on a sale deed executed on

04.04.2025, registered as Document No.2409 of 2025, executed between the 5th respondent and the other private respondents and that they have invited the proceedings under G.O.(Nilai) No.119, Home (Police-II) Department, dated

16.03.2023.

¶4The learned counsel for the first and third respondents submits that although the petitioner has given a representation dated 05.06.2025, there are no documents to substantiate that the 5th respondent has encroached upon the private land so as to attract the above Government Order. Only if there is grabbing of private land, can the aforesaid proceedings be initiated by the aggrieved party.

¶5Having considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the official respondents 1 to 4, after dispensing with notice to the private respondents, I am inclined to dispose of this Writ Petition at the time of admission by directing the first respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 05.06.2025 on merits in accordance with law and take appropriate action, if warranted in accordance with law. Needless to state, the private respondents shall be heard before the final orders are passed.

¶6This Writ Petition is disposed of with the above direction. No costs.

06.07.2026 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No Indu To

1.The Special Deputy Collector Cum Chairman, Revenue Court, Virudhunagar District, Virudhunagar.

2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police / Member Secretary, Anti-Land Grabbing Wing, Virudhunagar District, Virudhunagar.

3.The Assistant Registrar General, O/o.District Registrar, Virudhunagar District, Virudhunagar.

4.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, District Crime Branch – II, Virudhunagar District, Virudhunagar.

C.SARAVANAN, J.

Indu W.P(MD).No.18799 of 2026

06.07.2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 06.07.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN W.P(MD) No.18799 of 2026 M.Subbulakshmi ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Special Deputy Collector Cum Chairman, Revenue Court, Virudhunagar District, Virudhunagar. 2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police / Member Secretary, Anti-Land Grabbing Wing, Virudhunagar District, Virudhunagar. 3.The Assistant Registrar General, O/o.District Registrar, Virudhunagar District, Virudhunagar. 4.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, District Crime Branch – II, Virudhunagar District, Virudhunagar. 5.R.Radha 6.K.Papathi 7.K.Narayanasamy 8.K.Sekar 9.Shanmugathai 10.Tirupathy 11.Vadivu 12.Mariyammal 13.Kaleeshwari ...Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st respondent to conduct an enquiry on his representation dated 05.06.2025 and take appropriate action against the respondents 5 to 13 for creating fraudulent document to grab the Pathway situated in Ward-3, Block-10, T.S.No.1072/1, 1074/2 and 1074/3, Perumalpatti Thropathiamman Kovil Street, Srivilliputhur, Virudhunagar District in the light of G.O.(Nilai) No.119, Home (Police-II) Department dated 16.03.2023 as well as based on his representation dated 06.01.2025 within the time limit that may be stipulated by this Court for the facts and circumstances of the case. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Mohanasundaram For Respondents : Mr.S.Venkatesh Counsel for State of TN for R1 and R3 Mr.P.Vetrivel Government Advocate for R2 and R4

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.