Sikkiya Goudar(Died) (M/81/2015) v. Govindaraj,

ORDER When the Civil Revision Petition was listed on 31.10.2023, there was no representation for the petitioners. Hence, the matter was directed to be listed under the caption "for dismissal". Even today (ie.07.11.2023), when the matter is taken up for hearing, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners. The learned counsel for the first respondent is present.

¶2Hence, this Court is of the view that no purpose will be served to keep the Civil Revision Petition. Therefore, this Court is inclined to dismiss the Civil Revision Petition.

¶3The instant Civil Revision Petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to cost. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

Index:Yes/No

07.11.2023 Internet:Yes/No NCC:Yes/No Ls To

¶1The District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Vedasanthur, Dindigul District,

¶2The Section Officer, VR Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. P.B.BALAJI,J. Ls

07.11.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 07.11.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.B.BALAJI and C.M.P(MD)No.5054 of 2017 1.Sikkiya Goudar (Died) ... Petitioner / Petitioner / 5th Defendant 2.Muthusamy 3.Kannammal (P2 & P3 are brought on record as LRs of the deceased sole petitioner, vide Court order, dated 09.10.2023 inCMP(MD)Nos.61 to 63/2017) .... Petitioners .Vs. 1.Govindaraj ... 1st Respondent / 1st Respondent/ Plaintiff 2.Subbaiah 3.Krishnan 4.Muthamal 5.Thulasi ... Respondents 2 to 5/ Respondents 2 to 5 / Defendants 1 to 4 PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, against the fair and decretal order, passed by the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Vedasanthur, Dindigul District, in I.A.No.615 of 2013 in O.S.No.348 of 2012, on 25.09.2014. For Petitioners : No appearance For Respondents : Mr.G.Gomathi Sankar for R1 : No appearance for R2 toR5