- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 11 July 2023
- Bench
- G.R.Swaminathan
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 17183/2014
Judgment
ORDER The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner unable to get instructions.
¶2The learned Standing Counsel appearing for the Bank informs that Court that on 02.06.2022 the petition mentioned jewels were returned to the petitioner. Recording the submission of the learned Standing Counsel, this writ petition stands closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
11.07.2023 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No NCC : Yes / No MGA
G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. MGA
11.07.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 11.07.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN Subbian ... Petitioner Vs 1.The General Manager, Indian Overseas Bank, No.763, Anna Salai, Chennai – 600 002. 2.The Chief Manager, Indian Overseas Bank, Regional Office, Vetturnimadam, Nagercoil – 629 003, Kanyakumari District. 3.The Branch Manager, Indian Overseas Bank, Marungoor Branch, Kanyakumari District. ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the third respondent bank of return the pledged jewels in JL 208/97 (129700208) to the petitioner within a time frame may be fixed by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.Sreenivasan for Mr.R.Nandakumar For Respondents : Mr.M.Senthil Kumar Standing Counsel for R.2 & R.3 No Appearance for R.1
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.