Boominathan v. The State of Tamil Nadu, Represented by

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 22/07/2025 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.VADAMALAI Boominathan, S/o.Bharathi,

..Petitioner/ Accused No.2

Vs The State of Tamilnadu rep.by The Inspector of Police, Thilagar Thidal Police Station, Madurai District. (Crime No.810 of 2022) .. Respondent/Complainant

For Petitioner : Mr.K.Dinesh

Advocate.

For Respondent : Mr.B.Thanga Aravindh

Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec.483 of BNSS PRAYER :- For Bail in Crime No.810 of 2022 on the file of the Respondent Police. ORDER : This Court made the following order :- The petitioner / Accused No.2, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 21.04.2025 for the offences punishable under Sections 25(1A) of Arms Act, 1959 in Crime No.810 of 2022 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.

¶2The case of the prosecution is that the respondent police was conducted regular vehicle checkup, at that time, after seeing the police officials, the petitioner and other accused persons were tried to escape from the spot. The respondent police caught all the accused persons and enquired and check them, and they found three deadly weapons from the accused persons. Hence, the case.

¶3The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that on 28.01.2025, the petitioner has failed to appear before the trial Court. On 28.01.2025 a Non-Bailable Warrant was issued against the petitioner. On 21.04.2025, the NBW warrant was executed and the petitioner was arrested and remanded into judicial custody. This petitioner was arrested in another crime number Cr.No.312 of 2023 and subsequently released on bail. This petitioner is not at all intending to escape for evading from the law. The Non-appearance of the petitioner before the Trial Court is neither willful nor wanton. The petitioner is ready and willing to abide any conditions that may be imposed by this Court. He further submits that the petitioner undertakes that he will not abscond and he will regularly appear before the Trial Court on hearing dates without fail. He would further submit that the petitioner is in custody from 21.04.2025 nearly 90days. Hence, he seeks bail.

¶4The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) would submit that the petitioner failed to appear before the trial Court, due to which the trial Court had issued Non Bailable Warrant to the petitioner. The petitioner was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 21.04.2025. In this case, investigation was completed, charge sheet has also been filed and the same was taken on file in S.C.No.312 of 2023 on the file of the learned VI Additional District and Sessions Court, Madurai. Now the trial Court posted the case for framing of charges. In this case, already NBW issued to A4 and subsequently warrant was recalled. This petitioner is having three previous cases. If the petitioner released on bail, he would not appear for further hearings. Hence, he objected to grant bail to the petitioner.

¶5Taking into consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case and also taking note of the fact that investigation has been completed, charge sheet has also been filed and the same was taken on file in S.C.No.312 of 2023 on the file of the learned VI Additional District and Sessions Judge, Madurai, the said case is posted for framing of charges, considering the undertaking given by the learned Counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner/accused No.2 remanded into judicial custody on

21.04.2025, taking into consideration of the period of incarceration, this court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner, subject to the following conditions:

¶6Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate Court No.2, Madurai and on further conditions that :- [a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity. [b] The petitioner shall furnish his residential address and contact number to the learned Judicial Magistrate Court No.2, Madurai. If the petitioner changes his residential address, he shall report the same to the learned Judicial Magistrate Court No.2, Madurai; [c] the petitioner shall appear and sign before the respondent police daily

10.30a.m. except on hearing dates, until further orders; and also the petitioner shall appear before the concerned Trial Court on hearing dates. [d] the petitioner shall not abscond either during trial. [e] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial. [f] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. [g] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 BNS.

sd/-

22/07/2025

/ TRUE COPY /

22/07/2025

Sub-Assistant Registrar ( C.S. I / II / III / IV )

Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,

Madurai - 625 023. gvn TO

¶1The VI Additional District and Sessions Judge, Madurai.

¶2The Judicial Magistrate Court No.2, Madurai.

¶3Do Through The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madurai

4.The Superintendent, Central Prison, Madurai.

¶5The Inspector of Police, Thilagar Thidal Police Station, Madurai District.

¶6The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.12331 of 2025 Date :22/07/2025

SBN/22.07.2025 6P/7C Madurai Bench of Madras High Court is issuing certified copies in this format from 17/07/2023