- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 19 April 2023
- Bench
- B.Pugalendhi
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 17876/2014
Judgment
ORDER This writ petition is filed for a mandamus forbearing the 1st respondent from deducting the salary of the petitioner.
2.When the writ petition is taken up for hearing, the learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that since no interim order was granted in this writ petition in favour of the petitioner, the respondents recovered the money from the petitioner and therefore, nothing survives in this writ petition.
3.Recording the submission of the learned Counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is closed as infructuous. No costs.
19.04.2023 Internet : Yes / No dsk
B.PUGALENDHI, J. dsk
19.04.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated: 19.04.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI Saravanan ... Petitioner Vs 1.The Senior Manager, Canara Bank, Railway Junction Branch, Tiruchirappalli. 2.Ulaganathan ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus forbearing the 1st respondent from deducting the salary of the petitioner for the loan account No.1285626001111 without taking action against the 2nd respondent. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Muthukrishnan For Respondents : No appearance
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.