- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 26 September 2023
- Bench
- G.R.Swaminathan
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 18037/2014
Judgment
ORDER Heard both sides.
2.In this writ petition, the acquisition proceedings are under challenge.
3.When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned Additional Government Pleader informed the Court that in view of the change in alignment, the petition mentioned property is not proposed to be acquired.
4.Recording the said subsequent development, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs.
26.09.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No ias To:-
1.The Secretary, Highways and Minor Ports Department, St. George Fort, Chennai.
2.The District Revenue Officer, Tirunelveli & District.
G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. ias
26.09.2023 (1/2)
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 26.09.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN N.S.Ganesan ... Petitioner Vs. 1.Tamil Nadu Government, Through its the Secretary, Highways and Minor Ports Department, St. George Fort, Chennai. 2.District Revenue Officer, Tirunelveli & District. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records relating to the proceedings of the 2nd respondent in pursuance of Impugned Notification dated 15.09.2014 and quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.B.Rajesh Saravanan For Respondents : Mr.S.Shanmugavel, Addl. Government Pleader.
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.