M/S.Sri Prasanna Venkadajalapathi Sports and Recreation Club Madurai North v. The Superintendent of Police,

ORDER This petition has been filed seeking a direction to forbear the respondents particularly 3rd respondent their men or anyone acting under their authority from in any manner interfering with the lawful day-to-day recreational activities of the petitioner's club namely Sri Prasanna Venkadajalapathi Sports & Recreation Club, Madurai North, situated at No.43, K.Pappankulam Alagarkovil Road, Kathakinaru, Madurai District, except by following due process of law, based on the petitioner's representation, dated 25.06.2026.

¶2The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner club is being subjected to continuous harassment and that the respondent police are interfering with the peaceful conduct of its activities. It was further submitted that such interference is unwarranted and that the respondents ought to be restrained from interfering with the peaceful functioning of the club, particularly with regard to the playing of rummy without money. Accordingly, the present writ petition has been filed. In support of his contention, he also relied upon an order of this Court dated WP CRL.(MD)No.2459 of 2025 dated

09.12.2025.

¶3The learned Government Advocate(Crl.side) appearing for the respondent police submitted that the contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is wholly baseless and that the 3rd respondent police has not interfered with the affairs of the petitioner club.

¶4Heard the learned counsel on either side and carefully perused the materials before this Court.

¶5This Court, in WP CRL.(MD)No.2459 of 2025 dated 09.12.2025, held as follows:- "5. The submission of the learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) is recorded. It is also seen that a Division Bench of this Court in the case of the Director General of Police, State of Tamil Nadu, Mahalakshmi Cultural Association report in 2012(2) CTC 484 has gone into this aspect of recreation club permitting the recreation club to play rummy without stakes and held as follows : "24. On the basis of the above discussions, we arrive at the following conclusions:

(1) The game of rummy (13 card) is only a game of skill even though an element of chance is also involved.

(2) In the event rummy is played by the members or the guests without stakes, the provisions of the Chennai City Police Act are not attracted.

(3) In the event rummy is played by the members of the guests with stakes, the provisions of the Chennai City Police Act are attracted.

(4) In the event the Club/Association either allows its members or gusts to play rummy with stakes or make any profit or gain out of such gambling, the police has the authority to invoke the provisions of the Chennai City Police Act.

(5) In order to ascertain as to whether the premises is used as a gaming house for gambling, the police is entitles to invoke Section 23 of the Act."

¶6In view of the above, this Court directs that

(i) the petitioner Club shall not indulge in any activity by allowing its members or the guests to play rummy (13 cards) with stakes and make profit or gain.

(ii) the police are entitled to take action in the event of any illegal activity is carried on in the Club premises.

(iii) the police shall not disturb the petitioner-Club frequently under the guise of inspection without there being any reliable information as to the illegal activities of the Club or its members or the guests."

¶6In view of the submissions made by the learned Government Advocate(Crl.side) appearing for the respondent police, this Court imposes the following conditions:

(i) The petitioner club is permitted to conduct rummy games without stakes within its premises, and the respondent shall not interfere with the affairs of the club;

(ii) the petitioner Club shall not indulge in any activity by allowing its members or the guests to play rummy (13 cards) with stakes and make profit or gain;

(iii) However, it is made clear that if the petitioner indulges in any illegal activities, more particularly playing card games with stakes, the police are at liberty to take appropriate action in accordance with law if any such illegal activity is carried on in the club premises;

(iv) the police shall not disturb the petitioner-Club frequently under the guise of inspection without there being any reliable information as to the illegal activities of the Club or its members or the guests.

¶7with the above directions, this writ petition is disposed of.

01.07.2026 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No gbg TO:-

¶1The Superintendent of Police, Madurai.

2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Omachikulam Sub-Division, Madurai District.

3.The Inspector of Police, Appanthirupathi Police Station, Madurai District.

¶4The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

L.VICTORIA GOWRI, J. gbg Dated

01.07.2026

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 01.07.2026 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI M/s.Sri Prasanna Venkadajalapathi Sports and Recreation Club Madurai North, Rep. by its President, A. Adaikalam. ... Petitioner Vs. 1. The Superintendent of Police, Madurai. 2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Omachikulam Sub- Division, Madurai District. 3.The Inspector of Police, Appanthirupathi Police Station, Madurai District. ... Respondents PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the respondents, particularly 3rd respondent their men or anyone acting under their authority from in any manner interfering with the lawful day- to-day recreational activities of the petitioner's club namely Sri Prasanna Venkadajalapathi Sports & Recreation Club, Madurai North, situated at No.43, K.Pappankulam Alagarkovil Road, Kathakinaru, Madurai District, except by following due process of law, based on the petitioner's representation, dated 25.06.2026. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Vinodh For Respondents : Mr.D.Rajaboopathy Government Advocate(Crl.side)