- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 20 July 2023
- Bench
- S.S. Sundar, D.Bharatha Chakravarthy
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 18247/2014
Judgment
O R D E R [Order of the Court was made by S.S.SUNDAR, J.] The learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the 3rd respondent and counsel for the 4th respondent state that the acquisition proceedings have been withdrawn as the respondents have found alternative place. Since this writ petition is filed challenging the acquisition and the acquisition is now withdrawn, the prayer in this writ petition has become infructuous.
¶2Therefore, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. [S.S.S.R, J.] [D.B.C., J.]
20.07.2023 Index : Yes / No
bala To
¶1The Secretary to Government, Union of India, Ministry of Road Transport and Highways, Government of India, New Delhi.
¶2The Secretary to Government, State of Tamil Nadu, Highways and Small Ports (HV1) Department, Fort.St.George, Secretariat, Chennai-600 009.
¶3The Authorised Officer and Special District Revenue Officer (Land Acquisition) NH 67 (Thanjavur-Tiruchirappalli) District Collector Office Complex, District Collectorate, Tiruchirappalli-1.
¶4The Project Director, Project Implementation Unit, National Highways Authority of India, No.54, 1st Floor, Natarajapuram Colony, Medical College Road, Thanjavur.
S.S.SUNDAR , J. and
D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY , J. bala g
20.07.2023 ____________https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 20.07.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.S.SUNDAR and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY 1. M.Muthu Karuppan 2. P.Pavitharan 3. P.Thiagarajan 4. T. Malarkodi 5. K. Balasubramanian 6. S.Mubarak Jan 7. M.Chandramohan 8. SP.Chandrasekar 9. S.Samsudeen 10. M.K.Muthu Mohamed 11. S.Kandan 12. P.Angamuthu 13. M.Veerasamy 14. C.Palanisamy 15. Chellammal 16. N.Zhaheer Hussain 17. S.Aruputhasamy 18. V.Kanakaraj 19. K.Jeevanandam 20. B.Thayammal 21. N.Purushothaman 22. Purushotham D.Patil 23. S.Gaffar 24. P.Gurusamy ... Petitioners -vs- 1. The Union of India, Rep. by its Secretary to Government, Ministry of Road Transport and Highways, Government of India, New Delhi. 2. The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Secretary to Government, Highways and Small Ports (HV1) Department, Fort.St.George, Secretariat, Chennai-600 009. 3. The Authorised Officer and Special District Revenue Officer (Land Acquisition) NH 67 (Thanjavur-Tiruchirappalli) District Collector Office Complex, District Collectorate, Tiruchirappalli-1. 4. The Project Director, Project Implementation Unit, National Highways Authority of India, No.54, 1st Floor, Natarajapuram Colony, Medical College Road, Thanjavur. ... Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records relating to the proceedings viz., the Declaration made by the 1st respondent under Section 3D(1) of the National Highways Act, published in the Extra Ordinary Govt. Gazette on 21.05.2014 and the Declaration made under Section 3A(1) of the National Highways Act, published in the Extra Ordinary Government Gazette on 24.05.2013 and quash the same. For Petitioners : Mr.ARL.Sundaresan, Senior Counsel for Mr.C.Mahadevan For R1 : Mr.K.Govindarajan Deputy Solicitor General of India assisted by Mr.C.Nandagopal For R2 & R3 : Mr.M.Lingadurai Special Government Pleader For R4 : Mr.R.Rajagopal
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.